DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
I saw a liberal outlet describe it as an assault on the "temple of democracy", and I had to laugh at how appropriate the phrase was for Democrats to use.
Liberalism is their religion.
SOCIAL MEDIA GIANTS OPPRESSING THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF AMERICANS
- Thread starter Old Man Jingles
- Start date
Liberalism is their religion.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
I've made that clear.
So has every conservative outlet.
Democrats supported riots as the language of the unheard. You know this fact, you're just in denial.
Oh have you? I must have missed it. Hopefully someone can point it out for me.
They have to. They're not operating on anonymous internet message boards.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Yes. I made it clear those who were violent should be charged.
Now if you're going to keep pushing the lie that everyone there was violent and President Trump incited the riot, then of course I disagree with that nonsense.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Ahhh, you said it yesterday. I did miss it.
Any charges for anything else that happened last Wednesday or is it all good?
Should our criminal justice system also release some or all non-violent offenders? Shouldn't have been charged in the first place?
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
We have too many laws that have nothing to do with protecting natural rights, so I'm for releasing people who broke illegitimate laws. As for Wednesday it would go a long way towards "healing the nation" for members of congress to endorse not charging people who weren't there to cause problems.
Like if they only wandered into the halls of the Capitol Building out of curiosity and did nothing else? Makes sense to me.
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
Or just hung out outside. Or was that threat to charge anyone on the grounds fake news?
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
I'm sure the arrests of those who were violent will lead to other charges after investigation.
Don't be ridiculous.
If you're alluding to arresting everyone who went into the building with a trespassing type charge, I find that problematic given there is video of officers letting people in.
Now standing there watching violence and then bumrushing in right afterwards would be trespassing/participating in a riot or whatever the relevant federal code words it as.
But again, you have to investigate and prove these things, you shouldn't just condemn everyone who was there, because at some point the cops were letting people enter and leave freely.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
And were let in by a Capitol Policeman who is holding the door open for them.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
I've seen several lawyers on CNN say if they were outside and no violent acts, chances of convicting them would be close to zero.
Did you see the chief counsel of PBS just got fired after being secretly recorded saying some pretty extreme things? Glad that covid is blowing up in Red States and killing conservative voters. Said children of conservatives should be taken from their parents and put in reeducation camps. He was fired by PBS about an hour after Project Veritas released the video.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
When media folks are dumb around hidden cameras just like when delivery drivers are dumb around hidden cameras. LOL
Dem pravat compnies gotcherrrrr furst mendment raahts in a vice! LOL
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
Suppression of free speech.Dem pravat compnies gotcherrrrr furst mendment raahts in a vice! LOL
That is what I have said for the last 5 days ... unless I slipped up.
He was the chief counsel of PBS, not some schmoe from the back office. Reminds me of Mueller putting together a team of Democrats to investigate Russian collusion. Two of them, who were having an affair, got discovered having extreme bias towards Trump from their accidentally leaked text messages. Mueller had to fire them. Always seems to be Democrats being caught revealing extreme views.
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
My issue with calling them private companies is that they aren't by any definition, private. They are publicly traded, they are open to the public. I have my opinions about what that should mean for individual rights, but the real issue is that their practices are discriminatory on the basis of political and/or religious affiliation. The civil rights act prohibits such discrimination, and their is plenty of precedent against the idea that it is ok for "private" companies to discriminate or deny human rights as a prerequisite for engaging in business with them.
