Social Security

vantexan

Well-Known Member
They’re never going to have a separate vote for a contractual issue like pensions Wally.

And I believe a lot like you on Social Security it’s unsustainable, the point is they can change it whenever they want. It’s not “it is what it is” like you said it’s whatever they say whenever they say. And you don’t even get to vote on that. But somehow you think that’s fair?

We’ve heard the term kick the can down the road for a long time but I wonder what happens when there’s no more road to kick the can down ? I think I know and I don’t like what I think might happen.
The problem is the constant increase.in Federal spending with little regard to the danger that will impose on entitlement programs like SS. It's always make'em happy now, worry about the eventual problems later.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
The problem is the constant increase.in Federal spending with little regard to the danger that will impose on entitlement programs like SS. It's always make'em happy now, worry about the eventual problems later.
I agree, and it doesn’t seem like either side really wants fiscal responsibility. That’s gone out the window many years ago.
 

rod

Retired 22 years
The problem is the constant increase.in Federal spending with little regard to the danger that will impose on entitlement programs like SS. It's always make'em happy now, worry about the eventual problems later.

How can you possibly call it an "entitlement program"? That is money you and your employer has contributed for you. How come nobody ever say " make the cuts in the welfare programs"? LEAVE VETERANS PROGRAMS AND SS ALONE.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
How can you possibly call it an "entitlement program"? That is money you and your employer has contributed for you. How come nobody ever say " make the cuts in the welfare programs"? LEAVE VETERANS PROGRAMS AND SS ALONE.
You’re right it is money you put in there, the dirty trick is they already spent it. And then some. You are owed that money and earned it I agree.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
How can you possibly call it an "entitlement program"? That is money you and your employer has contributed for you. How come nobody ever say " make the cuts in the welfare programs"? LEAVE VETERANS PROGRAMS AND SS ALONE.
The problem with that is entitlement has been turned into a dirty word by those who want to end SS and Medicare. Entitlement means you contributed to the program all of your working life and thus are entitled to a payment from the program. It does not mean someone who hasn't done anything to earn something but feels entitled to something anyways. Those legitimately receiving payments from the system aren't leeches on the system but are getting what they were promised in exchange for contributing to the system during their working lives. And as such the part of the Federal budget that covers SS and Medicare is called entitlement spending which means they are required under Federal law to budget for and pay it out.
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns

From Money.com

How to fix Social Security

Here are five ways Social Security's financial challenges could be addressed so that it can pay out all scheduled benefits, according to the actuaries' report:

1. Increase payroll taxes

The payroll tax for Social Security, which is paid by workers and employers, could be hiked 25% in 2034 to make up the difference. That would be an increase from the current rate of 6.2% up to 7.75%. However, the report notes that this could be unaffordable for low-income Americans without additional changes to their federal income taxes. Gradual payroll tax increases, therefore, would be less disruptive.

2. Tax high earners more

Americans with high incomes do not pay Social Security taxes after a certain point — for 2023, the threshold is $160,200. The actuaries note Congress could consider the option of taxing all earned income. Removing this cap, however, would only make up for 78% of the projected shortfall.

3. Add new tax sources

The report floats the possibility of taxing investment income to fund Social Security or increasing estate and gift taxes. But it points out that not only has this not been done before, it also is likely to face resistance.

4. Reduce benefits for high earners

Congress has long adhered to a tradition of not cutting benefits for people already getting paid, but the report details several options to potentially reduce benefits for high-earning Americans who are not yet eligible for Social Security. However, these measures would be insufficient to fix the 2034 shortfall.

5. Raise the retirement age

Americans become eligible to take Social Security at 62, though benefits increase the longer you wait until age 70. The report considers several ideas for increasing retirement ages to address the shortfall, including gradual approaches that (theoretically) wouldn't feel grossly unfair to people in different age cohorts. But raising the retirement age would be especially painful for low-income Americans and anyone who works a physically demanding job.
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns

From Money.com

How to fix Social Security

Here are five ways Social Security's financial challenges could be addressed so that it can pay out all scheduled benefits, according to the actuaries' report:

1. Increase payroll taxes

The payroll tax for Social Security, which is paid by workers and employers, could be hiked 25% in 2034 to make up the difference. That would be an increase from the current rate of 6.2% up to 7.75%. However, the report notes that this could be unaffordable for low-income Americans without additional changes to their federal income taxes. Gradual payroll tax increases, therefore, would be less disruptive.

2. Tax high earners more

Americans with high incomes do not pay Social Security taxes after a certain point — for 2023, the threshold is $160,200. The actuaries note Congress could consider the option of taxing all earned income. Removing this cap, however, would only make up for 78% of the projected shortfall.

3. Add new tax sources

The report floats the possibility of taxing investment income to fund Social Security or increasing estate and gift taxes. But it points out that not only has this not been done before, it also is likely to face resistance.

4. Reduce benefits for high earners

Congress has long adhered to a tradition of not cutting benefits for people already getting paid, but the report details several options to potentially reduce benefits for high-earning Americans who are not yet eligible for Social Security. However, these measures would be insufficient to fix the 2034 shortfall.

5. Raise the retirement age

Americans become eligible to take Social Security at 62, though benefits increase the longer you wait until age 70. The report considers several ideas for increasing retirement ages to address the shortfall, including gradual approaches that (theoretically) wouldn't feel grossly unfair to people in different age cohorts. But raising the retirement age would be especially painful for low-income Americans and anyone who works a physically demanding job.
About number 4. Be aware they are talking about you Teamsters if you are getting lots of overtime. Number 5 should be first.
 

Up In Smoke

Well-Known Member
He didn't collect his president pay so he may not be collecting SS.
He did take his Presidential pay, but donated the pre-tax amount to government programs. I'm pretty sure, like other rich people, he doesn't receive an "income" from businesses. He most likely borrows against his assets and repays the loan and interest with next years loans. As long as the assets grow in proportion to the loans, everything flows and taxes are minimal as capital gains taxes are offset by interest deductions.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
He did take his Presidential pay, but donated the pre-tax amount to government programs. I'm pretty sure, like other rich people, he doesn't receive an "income" from businesses. He most likely borrows against his assets and repays the loan and interest with next years loans. As long as the assets grow in proportion to the loans, everything flows and taxes are minimal as capital gains taxes are offset by interest deductions.
Which is just another way to say Trump didn't take his pay. My understanding was he donated to veteran causes. And the VA.
 

Up In Smoke

Well-Known Member
Which is just another way to say Trump didn't take his pay. My understanding was he donated to veteran causes. And the VA.
No, he took it for the tax deductions. Here's where the dollars went. He retain his last quarters income
Screenshot_20240322-105740.png
 

Sportello

Well-Known Member
He's now collecting a pension, too.

We will never know if he actually made those donations, but it appears he did. He doesn't pay income tax, so know way of knowing if they are carried forward or even exist.

Never mind the millions he made and continues to make from charging the Secret Service for rooms charged above the government rate at properties he owns.
 
Last edited:

Commercial Inside Release

Well-Known Member
5. Raise the retirement age
About 1.5-2 years ago, France tried to raise their retirement age, resulting in firey riots for months. About that time, a friend of mine passed away at 54yo. She was sweet, worked hard all her life, and left a family behind that still needed her.

Don't be so eager to raise the retirement age. Gen-X and millennials have probably been exposed to more chemicals and various diseases than any humans yet on earth... Are you sure you're going to make it?
 
Top