so countries dont interfere in other countries affairs and elections?
Terrorists
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
I have no idea if he said that or not but if he did he most likely was joking. Evo Morales did his constitutionally allowed two terms. He tried to force being allowed a third term. The people rose up and he fled the country. Let me ask you, if a leader has the kind of politics you like is it ok in your eyes for him to ignore or violate their constitution? Or should the constitution be followed?
Sure, but that doesn't mean you can extrapolate that fact to every foreign election just because you don't like the big, bad US.
the US drone assassination program is a violation of US own system of law and justice, and is the newest development in global terrorism. they are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. wheres the due process?
constitution should be changed. im not entirely in favor of people always following hte laws. im very much in favor of what snowden did for example. im strongly in favor of civil disobedience to achieve more justice and freedom.
does america interfere in other countries and elections?
Oh, Jesus. Are you gonna start weeping over the death of Qasem Soleimani again?
"Should have asked Iran to send him for trial. HE WAS AN IRANIAN OFFICIAL! herp derrrrrrrrrp!"
I'm sure it has. Doesn't mean it'd be smart of me to fart out unproven accusations that the US is interfering with the elections of country x, y or z.
So if a leader wants to stay forever, and his policies are what you like, then the constitution should be changed, and people who disagree can pound sand. This is why we have constitutions, so that the people can change things through the election process, not by force. You apparently have an issue with democracy.
US drone assassination program is not limited to one person lol its widespread. you've blown up weddings of innocents.
btw im pretty sure bin laden should have been tried in a court of law in america, not murdered and thrown in the ocean.
yea i dont think laws should always be followed. im not sure about it. i know its ok to break the law sometimes the question is when.
WAHHHHHHH! THE US IS SO MEAN AND HEARTLESS TO THE TERRORISSSSSSSTS! WAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
You live by the sword, you did by the sword.
thats not how the law works actually.
It will be fine
Well-Known Member
You see anything wrong with the federal government declaring someone a terrorist and then killing them without due process?
If there's not pretty solid intelligence that they're a terrorist, sure. Have any cases for me to review?
the due process is all in the executive branch LOL
So the most important position in a government should be decided by whatever that powerful leader wants, not by the majority of its citizens? And of course that applies only to your side, not to the opposition. You talk about democracy all the time but apparently democracy in your view is only what you want it to be, not a framework that allows citizens to decide by majority. Citizens decide that something isn't working and they need a change. Adherence to their constitution insures a peaceful change. And they are free to change again in the next election. But you're saying they must do everything the way you want, and if you don't get what you want then throw out the constitution and use force to get what you want. No more free elections, they'll be shams to keep your party forever in power. So that's what you're about, seizing power and killing anyone who stands in your way? And you criticize the U.S.?
The US has the most extensive intelligence apparatus in the world, buddeh. It's not just the President deciding he's gonna off somebody he has his suspicions about.
Something tells me if Trump loses he's going to declare rioters domestic terrorists and clear them out before he leaves office.
Glad it wouldn't surprise you either.
Similar threads
