The debunked pseudoscience “gender identity” is being put in our contract.

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
I don't drink Bud light. I'm even more woke than that. I drink IPAs!
IMG_4116.jpeg
 

Jim Rockford

Well-Known Member
If those are the two issues that you cite for voting no, you were voting no, 'know' matter what.
Voting NO because no matter how much squishy coward live and let live boomerism claims otherwise, there is and shall never be any such thing as gender identity, and anything that tries to legitimize is not to be taken seriously. Really all protected classes shieldimg democrats should be gutted across the board.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Voting NO because no matter how much squishy coward live and let live boomerism claims otherwise, there is and shall never be any such thing as gender identity, and anything that tries to legitimize is not to be taken seriously. Really all protected classes shieldimg democrats should be gutted across the board.
It ain’t the boomers promoting it. Just saying.
 

Jim Rockford

Well-Known Member
Are you upset you won't be able to compete in the UPS Olympics? Was that one of your life long "sports" aspirations?
I guess my point was more that pathetic cowardice was what enabled monsters to steal their aspirations by legitimizing mental delusion, but I thon all so callednprotected classes should be totally gutted across the board.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Listen, I’ve always thought of UPS as the great equalizer. If you can put your browns on and do the job, no one gives a rip who you are, or what you do in your personal life. If you can’t do the job properly here, you don’t have any protected class for very long.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Listen, I’ve always thought of UPS as the great equalizer. If you can put your browns on and do the job, no one gives a rip who you are, or what you do in your personal life. If you can’t do the job properly here, you don’t have any protected class for very long.
I felt the same way. Not many women drivers when I started so I always paid attention to the ones we had out of curiosity as whether or not they could do the job. The majority could do it well enough. Those that couldn’t, quit.
 

KearsargeCoop

Baseball, dart board
I felt the same way. Not many women drivers when I started so I always paid attention to the ones we had out of curiosity as whether or not they could do the job. The majority could do it well enough. Those that couldn’t, quit.
We have one female driver in our small center and she'd beat some serious ass.
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
Voting NO because no matter how much squishy coward live and let live boomerism claims otherwise, there is and shall never be any such thing as gender identity, and anything that tries to legitimize is not to be taken seriously. Really all protected classes shieldimg democrats should be gutted across the board.
Kind of thinking you may have picked an ineffectual venue for your objections (voting no on your contract), one that might actually be counterintuitive.
 
Last edited:

10:30 resi

Well-Known Member
Voting NO because no matter how much squishy coward live and let live boomerism claims otherwise, there is and shall never be any such thing as gender identity, and anything that tries to legitimize is not to be taken seriously. Really all protected classes shieldimg democrats should be gutted across the board.
They are protected because they are teamsters, not because they are queer. It wouldn't work any other way. The great thing about the union is that it levels the playing field for all of us. If UPS was allowed to treat queer teamsters worse than heterosexual teamsters, UPS would be trying to only hire queer folks. Is that what you want?
 

TeltBender

Well-Known Member
How many trannys work here anyways? I always thought their dream jobs would be working as a barista or an escort or something, not box shifting.
 
Top