Time to vote on the Ohio Rider again

Mugarolla

Light 'em up!
Read my post again let me know and I will respond I don't think you read it

Read it again. Went too fast the first time. Looks like you were referring to Hoffa protecting the livelihoods off 250,000 members.

[QUOTEI know they are listening but you know as well as I do the healthcare and 17 I are not changing so what do we do next? He has nothing to gain by pissing people off so at some point you have to protect the livelihoods of 250,000 members. What would it take in your mind knowing those things aren't changing?][/QUOTE]


If Hoffa wants to protect the livelihoods of 250,000 members, I already suggested what he could do to get a yes vote and pass this rider. You keep saying it will never change. Never say never.

The only problem we have is the members who are getting tired of fighting for their future, for their kids future and are willing to give up for the sake of giving up. If we keep fighting, we CAN get it changed. Neither UPS nor Hoffa wants a strike, even if it localized.
[URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-10#ixzz2v9bAb9w3'] [/URL]
 
Last edited:

Stonefish

Well-Known Member
Good question. But has it even been brought up at the negotiating table. You say it will never happen. How do you know that. If UPS and Hoffa want this settled, it should be pretty easy. We, the members of the Ohio Rider should not be pissing anyone off. We are just trying to get what we feel we deserve. We are being put into an inferior healthcare plan than we have now, and UPS is making record profits. It makes no sense that we have to take concessions. If UPS was hurting like YRC, I'd be the first one to offer concessions to keep the company afloat and profitable. It has not come to that, and if it ever does, the concessions may be warranted. If the rest of you want to take concessions, so be it. Do not hate us for trying to get what we feel we deserve.

Local 89 has just started negotiating their air rider. I would say that we are months away from a settlement in Louisville, in my opinion. So the Ohio Rider is not holding anything up at the moment. I do feel for the employees that may have wanted to retire, but are in limbo about the $200/month pension increase. While the retro check keeps getting bigger, it is only what, $.70/hour. While it may help, I do not think it is affecting anyone's livelihood.

I have not heard of any shippers worried about a strike and diverting volume, anyone getting laid off due to the contract not being settled.

Basically, I would give up the 17i fight if we could just keep what we have now. No concessions. Teamcare is a concession. The rough math says Teamcare will cost me an additional $400 to $600 a year for years 1-4 and then an additional $200/year when the copay kicks in in year 5. While it is not an ungodly amount, it is still a concession for a company netting, I say again, netting, almost 5 billion dollars a year. There is also no guarantee that the benefits will remain at the levels that they are now. They can be changed at anytime and we have no recourse.

Forgive me for trying to stick up for what I feel we deserve. There will be no strike and the retro checks will come eventually.

You obviously didn't read it so what wrote was what does he have to gain by pissing people off. It is going to get settled and you will be in the same TeamCare Plan as everyone else. 17 I is not getting removed in the Ohio Rider. You admit it isn't going to happen but you keep hanging on to those 2 things. Are you one of my coworkers that say you don't care about a pay raise just raise the pension then are mad because you only got a measly $3.90 pay increase with a company that's making record profits. Oh yea and I would be willing to take co sessions. I call bull on that one.
You are also wrong about the Local 89 negotiations just for the record.
If you haven't heard about shippers and their concerns you need to get your head out of the sand.
As far as the benefits changing they can change under that great company plan you're under now there is no maintenance of benefits in that plan read it.
I don't fault you for sticking up for what you believe in and we all better hope that there isn't a strike vote because nobody wins in that situation.
Forgive me for being blunt it is not intended to be mean I don't want you to change your name because you get mad
 

Stonefish

Well-Known Member
It passed by a narrow margin the second time thru. This was due to misinformation or outright lies from Hoffa/Hall and our local that we would most likely strike if we voted it down again.
These are the same jokers that told us the first vote... "it aint gonna get any better; if you guys don't like it; you will be walking around picketing until your legs are stumps.

1st time it was hammered down.... Wow-- then somehow we got improvements over the first garbage deal.

The fear imposed by the local and the national union was too much for some people to see through.

No offense sir I'm not buying what you're selling
 

Stonefish

Well-Known Member
Read it again. Went too fast the first time. Looks like you were referring to Hoffa protecting the livelihoods off 250,000 members.

[QUOTEI know they are listening but you know as well as I do the healthcare and 17 I are not changing so what do we do next? He has nothing to gain by pissing people off so at some point you have to protect the livelihoods of 250,000 members. What would it take in your mind knowing those things aren't changing?]


If Hoffa wants to protect the livelihoods of 250,000 members, I already suggested what he could do to get a yes vote and pass this rider. You keep saying it will never change. Never say never.

The only problem we have is the members who are getting tired of fighting for their future, for their kids future and are willing to give up for the sake of giving up. If we keep fighting, we CAN get it changed. Neither UPS nor Hoffa wants a strike, even if it localized.
[/quote]

Let me say it this way never is a Lind time so.... It will never change you have already agreed it won't change.
Sorry but I'm trying to make comments short it's a :censored2: to do this on a phone.
 

Mugarolla

Light 'em up!
You obviously didn't read it so what wrote was what does he have to gain by pissing people off. It is going to get settled and you will be in the same TeamCare Plan as everyone else. 17 I is not getting removed in the Ohio Rider. You admit it isn't going to happen but you keep hanging on to those 2 things. Are you one of my coworkers that say you don't care about a pay raise just raise the pension then are mad because you only got a measly $3.90 pay increase with a company that's making record profits. Oh yea and I would be willing to take co sessions. I call bull on that one.
You are also wrong about the Local 89 negotiations just for the record.
If you haven't heard about shippers and their concerns you need to get your head out of the sand.
As far as the benefits changing they can change under that great company plan you're under now there is no maintenance of benefits in that plan read it.
I don't fault you for sticking up for what you believe in and we all better hope that there isn't a strike vote because nobody wins in that situation.
Forgive me for being blunt it is not intended to be mean I don't want you to change your name because you get mad

[QUOTEAre you one of my coworkers that say you don't care about a pay raise just raise the pension then are mad because you only got a measly $3.90 pay increase with a company that's making record profits

Read more: [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9hzRuj9][/QUOTE']http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9hzRuj9[/QUOTE']][/QUOTE[/URL]]

No. I am one of those people that is very happy with my wages. I would have rather the raises went to up the pension to a retireable level.

If you haven't heard about shippers and their concerns you need to get your head out of the sand.

Read more: http://www.browncafe.com/community/...ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9jZulhb

Oh yea and I would be willing to take co sessions. I call bull on that one

Read more: [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9iU6EwR[/QUOTE']http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9iU6EwR[/QUOTE[/URL]]

UPS provides me a good living. If they were hurting bad, about to go bankrupt or close, your damn right I would vote for concessions to keep the doors open. Even if we took a pay freeze and an increased deductible on insurance, it is still a good living. But we do not need any of that now.

You are also wrong about the Local 89 negotiations just for the record.

Read more: [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9jCdazy[/QUOTE']http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9jCdazy[/QUOTE[/URL]]

Louisville Local 89’s bargaining committee will meet with management on February 27-28 in hopes that management will finally agree to some reasonable improvements in the Louisville Air Rider.

If you haven't heard about shippers and their concerns you need to get your head out of the sand.

Read more: [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9jZulhb[/QUOTE']http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9jZulhb[/QUOTE[/URL]]

There are concerns, but no volume loss. Hell, we have shiny wheels pulling our trailers because we have so much volume that we cannot move. We have package drivers out till 8:00-9:00 PM because we don't have enough drivers to deliver the volume.

As far as the benefits changing they can change under that great company plan you're under now there is no maintenance of benefits in that plan read it.

Read more: [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9kO0Nla[/QUOTE']http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9kO0Nla[/QUOTE[/URL]]

Yes sir there is. The benefits are negotiated, not just the dollar amount contributed. If UPS wants to change our plan level, they have to get the Teamsters approval. If they change it without union approval, we can grieve it and possibly strike over it.

I don't fault you for sticking up for what you believe in and we all better hope that there isn't a strike vote because nobody wins in that situation.

Read more: [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9kygNQk[/QUOTE']http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9kygNQk[/QUOTE[/URL]]

Agreed. Nobody wants a strike. The exact reason that the Ohio Rider could change if it was turned down a third time.

Forgive me for being blunt it is not intended to be mean I don't want you to change your name because you get mad

Read more: [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9lNVgjp[/QUOTE']http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9lNVgjp[/QUOTE[/URL]]

I'm a big boy. I can take criticism, unlike other people on these boards. As long as it is constructive criticism and not bashing. I do not fault anyone for their opinions. That is the reason I wanted to hear from anonymous and his arguments for voting yes. Hell, even if he said because he wanted to go into Teamcare, I can respect his opinion. The only thing I heard was it's been long enough.

Sorry but I'm trying to make comments short it's a :censored2: to do this on a phone.

Read more: [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9mfWs5c[/QUOTE']http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9mfWs5c[/QUOTE[/URL]]

Been there. Done that.

Let me say it this way never is a Lind time so.... It will never change you have already agreed it won't change.

Read more: [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9mx9EkI[/QUOTE']http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9mx9EkI[/QUOTE[/URL]]

I agreed it would not change because there are too many anonymous's who say it has been long enough and are tired of fighting the fight. I could see it passing this time. I'm hoping I am wrong, and if turned down again, my opinion on "not changing" may "change."
 

Anonymous 12

Non active member
I gave my arguments against it. Why do you want it to pass? Just to get it over with. Nice attitude for a supposed steward.
My argument is riddled all through this message board for the last 8 9 months in threads on this forum. I have two names anonymous and 407. Look up my arguments there. I have no further want to explain myself. As far as the steward comment I'm not even going to go there because you haven't a clue.
 

Mugarolla

Light 'em up!
My argument is riddled all through this message board for the last 8 9 months in threads on this forum. I have two names anonymous and 407. Look up my arguments there. I have no further want to explain myself. As far as the steward comment I'm not even going to go there because you haven't a clue.

I will look back through your posts. Curious as to why you want to settle for an inferior contract. Might take some time though. That is why I just asked for a few arguments to save me a whole bunch of time. Your top 3 would have been fine so I can see where you're coming from. I will dig through all the old posts though.

Sent using BrownCafe App
 

Stonefish

Well-Known Member
[QUOTEAre you one of my coworkers that say you don't care about a pay raise just raise the pension then are mad because you only got a measly $3.90 pay increase with a company that's making record profits

Read more: http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/time-to-vote-on-the-ohio-rider-again.355013/page-11#ixzz2v9hzRuj9[/QUOTE']]

No. I am one of those people that is very happy with my wages. I would have rather the raises went to up the pension to a retireable level.[/quote]

Are you saying the 3.90 should go into the pension plan so they can increase is more? Or do you think UPS should take some of those "record profits" everyone keeps talking about and put it in your healthcare and pension? Or should you get those two things and the raises? What about the part-timers everyone claims to care about should they get the same? Or should the company take more of those "record profits" and put more into them also? I want one of the accountants on the people who run a multi billion dollar company to tell us how much money UPS should make per year based on fact not just some crap about record profits. Help me please because I just don't know how much they should make. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
 

Mugarolla

Light 'em up!
No. I am one of those people that is very happy with my wages. I would have rather the raises went to up the pension to a retireable level.

Are you saying the 3.90 should go into the pension plan so they can increase is more? Or do you think UPS should take some of those "record profits" everyone keeps talking about and put it in your healthcare and pension? Or should you get those two things and the raises? What about the part-timers everyone claims to care about should they get the same? Or should the company take more of those "record profits" and put more into them also? I want one of the accountants on the people who run a multi billion dollar company to tell us how much money UPS should make per year based on fact not just some crap about record profits. Help me please because I just don't know how much they should make. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.[/quote]

Have you read my posts. I am not like anonymous who said to go back through 9 months of posts to see what I said. I have only posted on this thread and there is only 11 pages. But I will be more than glad to tell you again. UPS can make their own profit margin by how much they charge for services compared to the cost of doing business (salaries, aircraft, feeders, package cars, etc). $32 some dollars an hour is a helluva a wage for what we are doing.

The average package driver probably makes $70,000-$80,000 and the average feeder driver probably $80,000-$90,000. Who is complaining about that money. 30 and out retirement is $36,000 before our $200/month increase which we are not seeing yet. This is less than half of what we make now. You basically can't retire until you are 62 or 65 and use Social Security to supplement your income. And for those younger employees Social Security may not even be around when they retire. There are some exceptions who have a good portfolio (401k, stocks, bonds) and can afford to retire on $36,000/yr. But these are the exceptions to the rule.

I would have elected to take my entire raise and send it to the pension fund to get a benefit of $54,000 annual pension. Do you remember in late 1997 I believe it was when we finally got a 30 and out pension? I think it started at 30 and out at $2500/month but was then raised to $3000/month. We were making around $20/hour at the time. You do the math. Your $3000/month pension was just a little less than a 40 hour work week. 40 hours at $20/hour is $3200/month. That was a good pension back then.

Right now we get $3200/month. A $200/month pension increase in 20 years! Do the math. At the current rate, a 40 hour work week grosses about $5100/month. Our pension should be a little less than the 40 hour work week. That's how I am coming up with a $4500/month pension. If it needs another $3.90 an hour over the next 5 years to get it there, hell yes, send the raise to it. Most people will not increase their savings based on the raise they get. Most will usually just spend it. So sending it to a defined pension sounds like a better idea. They can then count on that money when they retire.

About the "record profits," I have never said to take more. I have said to at least keep what we have now. Why should we have to take a concession when the company is making "record profits." The company giving up 17i has nothing to do with financials. Teamcare is a concession.

Talk to any accountant. A P/E ratio (price to earnings) in the double digits means a company is financially strong and doing "VERY" well. UPS, I believe was around 12 the last time I looked. This is where they like to be. This 12 P/E nets them between $4 Billion and $5 Billion/yr. But by doing "VERY" well, I believe they can pay the part timers more and still keep their P/E above 10. Full time rate is excellent except for the lengthy progression. I started part time in 1984 at $8.00/hour. Excellent wage back then. Until the last contract, part timers remained at that $8.00/hr starting rate for the last 25 years. In that 25 years, the full time rate increased by almost $20/hr.

Yes you read that right. Full time got a $20/hr increase and part time got a $.50 increase in the past 25 years. They got a little more this contract, but this is ridiculous.

So UPS can make as much as they want by charging what they want but they can price themselves right out of business. Paying the part timers more and keeping the full timers where they are at or a COLA increase, sending the typical $.50-$.70/hr raise to keep up with pension costs can still keep them competitively priced and keep their P/E in the double digits, allow the part timers to at least be able to put food on the table, allow the full timers a reasonable pension and make everyone relatively happy, except for obviously, YOU.
 

Stonefish

Well-Known Member
Are you saying the 3.90 should go into the pension plan so they can increase is more? Or do you think UPS should take some of those "record profits" everyone keeps talking about and put it in your healthcare and pension? Or should you get those two things and the raises? What about the part-timers everyone claims to care about should they get the same? Or should the company take more of those "record profits" and put more into them also? I want one of the accountants on the people who run a multi billion dollar company to tell us how much money UPS should make per year based on fact not just some crap about record profits. Help me please because I just don't know how much they should make. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Have you read my posts. I am not like anonymous who said to go back through 9 months of posts to see what I said. I have only posted on this thread and there is only 11 pages. But I will be more than glad to tell you again. UPS can make their own profit margin by how much they charge for services compared to the cost of doing business (salaries, aircraft, feeders, package cars, etc). $32 some dollars an hour is a helluva a wage for what we are doing.

The average package driver probably makes $70,000-$80,000 and the average feeder driver probably $80,000-$90,000. Who is complaining about that money. 30 and out retirement is $36,000 before our $200/month increase which we are not seeing yet. This is less than half of what we make now. You basically can't retire until you are 62 or 65 and use Social Security to supplement your income. And for those younger employees Social Security may not even be around when they retire. There are some exceptions who have a good portfolio (401k, stocks, bonds) and can afford to retire on $36,000/yr. But these are the exceptions to the rule.

I would have elected to take my entire raise and send it to the pension fund to get a benefit of $54,000 annual pension. Do you remember in late 1997 I believe it was when we finally got a 30 and out pension? I think it started at 30 and out at $2500/month but was then raised to $3000/month. We were making around $20/hour at the time. You do the math. Your $3000/month pension was just a little less than a 40 hour work week. 40 hours at $20/hour is $3200/month. That was a good pension back then.

Right now we get $3200/month. A $200/month pension increase in 20 years! Do the math. At the current rate, a 40 hour work week grosses about $5100/month. Our pension should be a little less than the 40 hour work week. That's how I am coming up with a $4500/month pension. If it needs another $3.90 an hour over the next 5 years to get it there, hell yes, send the raise to it. Most people will not increase their savings based on the raise they get. Most will usually just spend it. So sending it to a defined pension sounds like a better idea. They can then count on that money when they retire.

About the "record profits," I have never said to take more. I have said to at least keep what we have now. Why should we have to take a concession when the company is making "record profits." The company giving up 17i has nothing to do with financials. Teamcare is a concession.

Talk to any accountant. A P/E ratio (price to earnings) in the double digits means a company is financially strong and doing "VERY" well. UPS, I believe was around 12 the last time I looked. This is where they like to be. This 12 P/E nets them between $4 Billion and $5 Billion/yr. But by doing "VERY" well, I believe they can pay the part timers more and still keep their P/E above 10. Full time rate is excellent except for the lengthy progression. I started part time in 1984 at $8.00/hour. Excellent wage back then. Until the last contract, part timers remained at that $8.00/hr starting rate for the last 25 years. In that 25 years, the full time rate increased by almost $20/hr.

Yes you read that right. Full time got a $20/hr increase and part time got a $.50 increase in the past 25 years. They got a little more this contract, but this is ridiculous.

So UPS can make as much as they want by charging what they want but they can price themselves right out of business. Paying the part timers more and keeping the full timers where they are at or a COLA increase, sending the typical $.50-$.70/hr raise to keep up with pension costs can still keep them competitively priced and keep their P/E in the double digits, allow the part timers to at least be able to put food on the table, allow the full timers a reasonable pension and make everyone relatively happy, except for obviously, YOU.[/quote]

Not asking you to go through 9 months of posts but I would like to know how much profit they should make? The post isn't just intended for you. They can only charge so much for services. If you have looked at the cost of doing business compared to our non union competition our cost of doing business is FAR above our competition which by the way has better time in transit in more locations than us now. The $32 wage rate is actually $50 per hour which most people don't factor H and W & Pension into their wages. It is one hell of a wage rate. And by the way every freakin penny is earned.
You and I may have elected to put the $3.90 into pension to try to see an increase because we are very close in seniority and retirement but the people at the bottom aren't thinking about that. Did you when you were 21 and started driving? Probably not.
As far as talking to any accountant I want to hear from the accountant on here that is running a multibillion dollar company tell me how much they should make. I don't think anyone on this site is qualified to answer that myself included. It is easy for people to make those statements without anything to back it up or never having negotiated a contract.
If they put the pay raise into pension and increased the part-time rate $3.90 the contract would NEVER pass. There are already part-time employees making more than you are as a package car driver that's why they got rid of the catch up raise last contract.
I was a part-time employee working another job because it is intended to be a part-time job. Do I think they should make more hell yes but where does it come from. They can't change benefits, vacations or anything else because no one would vote for it.
By the way what's with the YOU in caps that hurt my feelings.
 

Anonymous 12

Non active member
Are you saying the 3.90 should go into the pension plan so they can increase is more? Or do you think UPS should take some of those "record profits" everyone keeps talking about and put it in your healthcare and pension? Or should you get those two things and the raises? What about the part-timers everyone claims to care about should they get the same? Or should the company take more of those "record profits" and put more into them also? I want one of the accountants on the people who run a multi billion dollar company to tell us how much money UPS should make per year based on fact not just some crap about record profits. Help me please because I just don't know how much they should make. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Have you read my posts. I am not like anonymous who said to go back through 9 months of posts to see what I said. I have only posted on this thread and there is only 11 pages. But I will be more than glad to tell you again. UPS can make their own profit margin by how much they charge for services compared to the cost of doing business (salaries, aircraft, feeders, package cars, etc). $32 some dollars an hour is a helluva a wage for what we are doing.

The average package driver probably makes $70,000-$80,000 and the average feeder driver probably $80,000-$90,000. Who is complaining about that money. 30 and out retirement is $36,000 before our $200/month increase which we are not seeing yet. This is less than half of what we make now. You basically can't retire until you are 62 or 65 and use Social Security to supplement your income. And for those younger employees Social Security may not even be around when they retire. There are some exceptions who have a good portfolio (401k, stocks, bonds) and can afford to retire on $36,000/yr. But these are the exceptions to the rule.

I would have elected to take my entire raise and send it to the pension fund to get a benefit of $54,000 annual pension. Do you remember in late 1997 I believe it was when we finally got a 30 and out pension? I think it started at 30 and out at $2500/month but was then raised to $3000/month. We were making around $20/hour at the time. You do the math. Your $3000/month pension was just a little less than a 40 hour work week. 40 hours at $20/hour is $3200/month. That was a good pension back then.

Right now we get $3200/month. A $200/month pension increase in 20 years! Do the math. At the current rate, a 40 hour work week grosses about $5100/month. Our pension should be a little less than the 40 hour work week. That's how I am coming up with a $4500/month pension. If it needs another $3.90 an hour over the next 5 years to get it there, hell yes, send the raise to it. Most people will not increase their savings based on the raise they get. Most will usually just spend it. So sending it to a defined pension sounds like a better idea. They can then count on that money when they retire.

About the "record profits," I have never said to take more. I have said to at least keep what we have now. Why should we have to take a concession when the company is making "record profits." The company giving up 17i has nothing to do with financials. Teamcare is a concession.

Talk to any accountant. A P/E ratio (price to earnings) in the double digits means a company is financially strong and doing "VERY" well. UPS, I believe was around 12 the last time I looked. This is where they like to be. This 12 P/E nets them between $4 Billion and $5 Billion/yr. But by doing "VERY" well, I believe they can pay the part timers more and still keep their P/E above 10. Full time rate is excellent except for the lengthy progression. I started part time in 1984 at $8.00/hour. Excellent wage back then. Until the last contract, part timers remained at that $8.00/hr starting rate for the last 25 years. In that 25 years, the full time rate increased by almost $20/hr.

Yes you read that right. Full time got a $20/hr increase and part time got a $.50 increase in the past 25 years. They got a little more this contract, but this is ridiculous.

So UPS can make as much as they want by charging what they want but they can price themselves right out of business. Paying the part timers more and keeping the full timers where they are at or a COLA increase, sending the typical $.50-$.70/hr raise to keep up with pension costs can still keep them competitively priced and keep their P/E in the double digits, allow the part timers to at least be able to put food on the table, allow the full timers a reasonable pension and make everyone relatively happy, except for obviously, YOU.[/quote]
This is the longest post in the history of the brown cafe. I don't have the attention span to read it tonight. If you want the short version vote yes.
 

Stonefish

Well-Known Member
Have you read my posts. I am not like anonymous who said to go back through 9 months of posts to see what I said. I have only posted on this thread and there is only 11 pages. But I will be more than glad to tell you again. UPS can make their own profit margin by how much they charge for services compared to the cost of doing business (salaries, aircraft, feeders, package cars, etc). $32 some dollars an hour is a helluva a wage for what we are doing.

The average package driver probably makes $70,000-$80,000 and the average feeder driver probably $80,000-$90,000. Who is complaining about that money. 30 and out retirement is $36,000 before our $200/month increase which we are not seeing yet. This is less than half of what we make now. You basically can't retire until you are 62 or 65 and use Social Security to supplement your income. And for those younger employees Social Security may not even be around when they retire. There are some exceptions who have a good portfolio (401k, stocks, bonds) and can afford to retire on $36,000/yr. But these are the exceptions to the rule.

I would have elected to take my entire raise and send it to the pension fund to get a benefit of $54,000 annual pension. Do you remember in late 1997 I believe it was when we finally got a 30 and out pension? I think it started at 30 and out at $2500/month but was then raised to $3000/month. We were making around $20/hour at the time. You do the math. Your $3000/month pension was just a little less than a 40 hour work week. 40 hours at $20/hour is $3200/month. That was a good pension back then.

Right now we get $3200/month. A $200/month pension increase in 20 years! Do the math. At the current rate, a 40 hour work week grosses about $5100/month. Our pension should be a little less than the 40 hour work week. That's how I am coming up with a $4500/month pension. If it needs another $3.90 an hour over the next 5 years to get it there, hell yes, send the raise to it. Most people will not increase their savings based on the raise they get. Most will usually just spend it. So sending it to a defined pension sounds like a better idea. They can then count on that money when they retire.

About the "record profits," I have never said to take more. I have said to at least keep what we have now. Why should we have to take a concession when the company is making "record profits." The company giving up 17i has nothing to do with financials. Teamcare is a concession.

Talk to any accountant. A P/E ratio (price to earnings) in the double digits means a company is financially strong and doing "VERY" well. UPS, I believe was around 12 the last time I looked. This is where they like to be. This 12 P/E nets them between $4 Billion and $5 Billion/yr. But by doing "VERY" well, I believe they can pay the part timers more and still keep their P/E above 10. Full time rate is excellent except for the lengthy progression. I started part time in 1984 at $8.00/hour. Excellent wage back then. Until the last contract, part timers remained at that $8.00/hr starting rate for the last 25 years. In that 25 years, the full time rate increased by almost $20/hr.

Yes you read that right. Full time got a $20/hr increase and part time got a $.50 increase in the past 25 years. They got a little more this contract, but this is ridiculous.

So UPS can make as much as they want by charging what they want but they can price themselves right out of business. Paying the part timers more and keeping the full timers where they are at or a COLA increase, sending the typical $.50-$.70/hr raise to keep up with pension costs can still keep them competitively priced and keep their P/E in the double digits, allow the part timers to at least be able to put food on the table, allow the full timers a reasonable pension and make everyone relatively happy, except for obviously, YOU.
This is the longest post in the history of the brown cafe. I don't have the attention span to read it tonight. If you want the short version vote yes.[/quote]

Hell Yes
 

Mugarolla

Light 'em up!
Have you read my posts. I am not like anonymous who said to go back through 9 months of posts to see what I said. I have only posted on this thread and there is only 11 pages. But I will be more than glad to tell you again. UPS can make their own profit margin by how much they charge for services compared to the cost of doing business (salaries, aircraft, feeders, package cars, etc). $32 some dollars an hour is a helluva a wage for what we are doing.

The average package driver probably makes $70,000-$80,000 and the average feeder driver probably $80,000-$90,000. Who is complaining about that money. 30 and out retirement is $36,000 before our $200/month increase which we are not seeing yet. This is less than half of what we make now. You basically can't retire until you are 62 or 65 and use Social Security to supplement your income. And for those younger employees Social Security may not even be around when they retire. There are some exceptions who have a good portfolio (401k, stocks, bonds) and can afford to retire on $36,000/yr. But these are the exceptions to the rule.

I would have elected to take my entire raise and send it to the pension fund to get a benefit of $54,000 annual pension. Do you remember in late 1997 I believe it was when we finally got a 30 and out pension? I think it started at 30 and out at $2500/month but was then raised to $3000/month. We were making around $20/hour at the time. You do the math. Your $3000/month pension was just a little less than a 40 hour work week. 40 hours at $20/hour is $3200/month. That was a good pension back then.

Right now we get $3200/month. A $200/month pension increase in 20 years! Do the math. At the current rate, a 40 hour work week grosses about $5100/month. Our pension should be a little less than the 40 hour work week. That's how I am coming up with a $4500/month pension. If it needs another $3.90 an hour over the next 5 years to get it there, hell yes, send the raise to it. Most people will not increase their savings based on the raise they get. Most will usually just spend it. So sending it to a defined pension sounds like a better idea. They can then count on that money when they retire.

About the "record profits," I have never said to take more. I have said to at least keep what we have now. Why should we have to take a concession when the company is making "record profits." The company giving up 17i has nothing to do with financials. Teamcare is a concession.

Talk to any accountant. A P/E ratio (price to earnings) in the double digits means a company is financially strong and doing "VERY" well. UPS, I believe was around 12 the last time I looked. This is where they like to be. This 12 P/E nets them between $4 Billion and $5 Billion/yr. But by doing "VERY" well, I believe they can pay the part timers more and still keep their P/E above 10. Full time rate is excellent except for the lengthy progression. I started part time in 1984 at $8.00/hour. Excellent wage back then. Until the last contract, part timers remained at that $8.00/hr starting rate for the last 25 years. In that 25 years, the full time rate increased by almost $20/hr.

Yes you read that right. Full time got a $20/hr increase and part time got a $.50 increase in the past 25 years. They got a little more this contract, but this is ridiculous.

So UPS can make as much as they want by charging what they want but they can price themselves right out of business. Paying the part timers more and keeping the full timers where they are at or a COLA increase, sending the typical $.50-$.70/hr raise to keep up with pension costs can still keep them competitively priced and keep their P/E in the double digits, allow the part timers to at least be able to put food on the table, allow the full timers a reasonable pension and make everyone relatively happy, except for obviously, YOU.

Not asking you to go through 9 months of posts but I would like to know how much profit they should make? The post isn't just intended for you. They can only charge so much for services. If you have looked at the cost of doing business compared to our non union competition our cost of doing business is FAR above our competition which by the way has better time in transit in more locations than us now. The $32 wage rate is actually $50 per hour which most people don't factor H and W & Pension into their wages. It is one hell of a wage rate. And by the way every freakin penny is earned.
You and I may have elected to put the $3.90 into pension to try to see an increase because we are very close in seniority and retirement but the people at the bottom aren't thinking about that. Did you when you were 21 and started driving? Probably not.
As far as talking to any accountant I want to hear from the accountant on here that is running a multibillion dollar company tell me how much they should make. I don't think anyone on this site is qualified to answer that myself included. It is easy for people to make those statements without anything to back it up or never having negotiated a contract.
If they put the pay raise into pension and increased the part-time rate $3.90 the contract would NEVER pass. There are already part-time employees making more than you are as a package car driver that's why they got rid of the catch up raise last contract.
I was a part-time employee working another job because it is intended to be a part-time job. Do I think they should make more hell yes but where does it come from. They can't change benefits, vacations or anything else because no one would vote for it.
By the way what's with the YOU in caps that hurt my feelings.[/quote]

Not intended to hurt your feelings, just to emphasize. Here is how much a company should make. My brother is a CPA. Auditing and advising multibillion dollar companies. From his opinion, and only his opinion, companies strive to achieve a double digit P/E ratio. UPS is there. So they should be making enough. And they are. They only raise their rates to keep up with labor costs and inflation. I'm sure they would like more, but the competition keeps them from being too greedy.

You do realize, of course, that we are the company. Management may run the company, but we are the company. We supply the blood, sweat, tears, pain and late nights. So as the profits go up, do you not think that we deserve a share of the profits? I did not say "all" the profits but a share of them. Management also deserves a share of the profits. Then the company as a whole deserves a share of the profits. Why do you think all the profits should go to the company when we are the company?

Problem is, there are not enough full time employees that care about the part timers. And not enough part timers that even themselves don't care enough to cast a ballot. This is why the part timers always lose. Remember when 2 part time votes only counted the same as 1 full time vote? They will always lose and never get what they deserve. The only reason they got a raise was to get a few of them to vote yes on the contract to counter the no votes from the full timers.

I agree that it is a part time job, but a lot of them aspire to go full time and sometimes have to work another full time job just to makes ends meet. They hold on to the part time job hoping that one day their seniority will allow them to go full time. McDonalds pays more.

Our cost of doing business may be more than our competitors, but we must be doing something right. We still maintain our volume. Sure we lose some, get some, lose some, etc. But in the end, our volume has remained consistent. FedEx and the USPS have not really grown that much and taken a lot away from us. Can that change? Sure, that is why UPS needs to keep its pricing competitive. Which they do and still keep a double digit P/E. So if their profits go up, Yes, I feel we deserve our share.
 

Stonefish

Well-Known Member
Not asking you to go through 9 months of posts but I would like to know how much profit they should make? The post isn't just intended for you. They can only charge so much for services. If you have looked at the cost of doing business compared to our non union competition our cost of doing business is FAR above our competition which by the way has better time in transit in more locations than us now. The $32 wage rate is actually $50 per hour which most people don't factor H and W & Pension into their wages. It is one hell of a wage rate. And by the way every freakin penny is earned.
You and I may have elected to put the $3.90 into pension to try to see an increase because we are very close in seniority and retirement but the people at the bottom aren't thinking about that. Did you when you were 21 and started driving? Probably not.
As far as talking to any accountant I want to hear from the accountant on here that is running a multibillion dollar company tell me how much they should make. I don't think anyone on this site is qualified to answer that myself included. It is easy for people to make those statements without anything to back it up or never having negotiated a contract.
If they put the pay raise into pension and increased the part-time rate $3.90 the contract would NEVER pass. There are already part-time employees making more than you are as a package car driver that's why they got rid of the catch up raise last contract.
I was a part-time employee working another job because it is intended to be a part-time job. Do I think they should make more hell yes but where does it come from. They can't change benefits, vacations or anything else because no one would vote for it.
By the way what's with the YOU in caps that hurt my feelings.

Not intended to hurt your feelings, just to emphasize. Here is how much a company should make. My brother is a CPA. Auditing and advising multibillion dollar companies. From his opinion, and only his opinion, companies strive to achieve a double digit P/E ratio. UPS is there. So they should be making enough. And they are. They only raise their rates to keep up with labor costs and inflation. I'm sure they would like more, but the competition keeps them from being too greedy.

You do realize, of course, that we are the company. Management may run the company, but we are the company. We supply the blood, sweat, tears, pain and late nights. So as the profits go up, do you not think that we deserve a share of the profits? I did not say "all" the profits but a share of them. Management also deserves a share of the profits. Then the company as a whole deserves a share of the profits. Why do you think all the profits should go to the company when we are the company?

Problem is, there are not enough full time employees that care about the part timers. And not enough part timers that even themselves don't care enough to cast a ballot. This is why the part timers always lose. Remember when 2 part time votes only counted the same as 1 full time vote? They will always lose and never get what they deserve. The only reason they got a raise was to get a few of them to vote yes on the contract to counter the no votes from the full timers.

I agree that it is a part time job, but a lot of them aspire to go full time and sometimes have to work another full time job just to makes ends meet. They hold on to the part time job hoping that one day their seniority will allow them to go full time. McDonalds pays more.

Our cost of doing business may be more than our competitors, but we must be doing something right. We still maintain our volume. Sure we lose some, get some, lose some, etc. But in the end, our volume has remained consistent. FedEx and the USPS have not really grown that much and taken a lot away from us. Can that change? Sure, that is why UPS needs to keep its pricing competitive. Which they do and still keep a double digit P/E. So if their profits go up, Yes, I feel we deserve our share.[/quote]

Before I respond just out of curiosity what company does your brother represent that has over 400,000 employees in the us? And just for the record it is not meant to be against your brother I would like to com pair apples to apples
 

O/C

Well-Known Member
This is why the part timers always lose. Remember when 2 part time votes only counted the same as 1 full time vote? They will always lose and never get what they deserve.

Stone, I believe that a part time vote is the same as a full time vote. No sure about your quote that they count differently.
 
Top