First things first. Show the Agreement to be "unconscionable" in both form and application.I have received letters from law firms wanting to compile information from contractors who were contracted from the years 2007 up until the present as well as from the years 2011 up until the present trying to build another class action to filed at the state level.
Your exactly what X wants, someone who is blind to the fact that they are being taken advantage of. Anything X does you defend, I don't know if you do it just for argument sake or are you really that much of a fool. Even iwbf is starting to see the reality of the scam.First things first. Show the Agreement to be "unconscionable" in both form and application.
You, sir, are a complete idiot.Your exactly what X wants, someone who is blind to the fact that they are being taken advantage of. Anything X does you defend, I don't know if you do it just for argument sake or are you really that much of a fool. Even iwbf is starting to see the reality of the scam.
Yet you signed it......due diligence.....idiotYou, sir, are a complete idiot.
I am doing exactly the opposite. I am describing the road map to the eventual challenge to the CSP model.
Showing this contract to be unconscionable should be a slam dunk.
Of course I signed it. I've signed them for 22 years. I'll play along until it changes again when the next court challenge comes.Yet you signed it......due diligence.....idiot
Or, it might bite you in the ass.Of course I signed it. I've signed them for 22 years. I'll play along until it changes again when the next court challenge comes.
The thing is, you can't do "due diligence". The contract means nothing until they come along after and tell you what it means. It's a pain in the ass and one day I guess it will bite them in the ass. Until then, I'm not all that upset by my situation.
That's the nature of every investment. They go up, they go down.Or, it might bite you in the ass.
You have a selective memory, you forget your past post about "due diligence".
You don't negotiate whether you think you do or not. The longer you hang on the less your business will be worth. Enjoy your situation.
Not afraid of borrowed money. Bankruptcy only hurts a little while.For the time being think of what my first terminal manager told me. " I admit it. It's a rotten deal but you signed it. But I am going to tell you how to survive. Keep borrowed money to a minimum and limited your exposure to risk and to variable costs to only that which you cannot avoid". Wise words indeed.
It's not the language, it's their actions that have cost them these lawsuits. Like I said before there would have to be monumental change, and cultural shift within FedEx to avoid these suits. That's not gonna happen because they know they have to possess an element of control to meet the demands of customers and compete with UPS. THE ALTERNATIVE is to seek out REAL COMPETENT businesses to do the work in its entirety without assistance from x, but that's to hard, easier to pay lawsuits, at least for the time being.There's a lot of language in the agreement that will make those very unlikely.
I stand corrected it's more their actions, the language presents problems alsoIt's not the language, it's their actions that have cost them these lawsuits. Like I said before there would have to be monumental change, and cultural shift within FedEx to avoid these suits. That's not gonna happen because they know they have to possess an element of control to meet the demands of customers and compete with UPS. THE ALTERNATIVE is to seek out REAL COMPETENT businesses to do the work in its entirety without assistance from x, but that's to hard, easier to pay lawsuits, at least for the time being.