satellitedriver
Senior Member
Prototelis-
I'm not one to pass up a spirited debate so I hope you won't mind a few questions. I wish I could put up a highly choreographed post but I'm just a truck driver so please bear with me.
Your first few statements suggest that you have a background in pulmonology and chemistry. I'm just curious what your credentials are.
Tobacco, fried chicken, mountain chesse and certain fish may have phenol in them but do you think it's at the same concentration as the saturated airspace that this individual walked into?
I am surprised that this individual would exhibit the symptoms/signs that he claims was caused by the exposure to phenol prior to the exposure and absolutely no one around him at the center or PCM didn't notice it.
"......because for all intensive purposes......".
Shouldn't that be "...for all intents and purposes...."?
Regarding the injury to your tooth, "...they could have just pulled the broken tooth out." They also could have taken you out to the nearest wall, lined you up and shot you but they didn't. I would be interested in knowing what happens when, in time, that chunk of composite veneer comes out of your tooth because of normal wear and tear due to axial torsion, pressure and the rigors of tearing/chewing your food. Do you think the company is gonna take care of that tooth for the rest of your life? Probably not.
Perhaps the company is trying to figure out a "one time", quick fix to the individual that was exposed to phenol.
I welcome your rebuttal.
Disclaimer: Did everyone notice I made it all the way through this post without any name calling, without any vulgar language and without questioning Prototelis' sexuality as some management posters have done to me when my opinion doesn't necessarily agree with theirs?
Amazing isn't it?
So proud of you 1 trick pony