Teamsters......the enemy?

Returntosender

Well-Known Member
I consider it a fringe group aligned with Democrats(generally), therefore supported by the Teamsters. Other than that.......nothing. Note: there were many other groups listed. Most of those groups proudly and loudly align themselves with Democrats....fact.

Log cabin republicans. National gay and lesbianRepublican grassroots organization. Articles on issues, upcoming elections, and events. http://www.logcabin.org


GOProud is a national organization of gay and straight Americans who seek to promote freedom by supporting free markets, limited government and a respect https://web.archive.org/web/20121017182206/https://www.goproud.org/sslpage.aspx?pid=403&tab=3
 

OptimusPrime

Well-Known Member
First......no one has "complained" about gays or minorities. It has simply been pointed out that they "generally" make up the Democrat party(amonst others). Now, I have a better idea......let's get rid of the commie, socialist, liberal Democrats that run the Teamsters? The commie, socialist, liberal left-wing has a whole other agenda that I DO NOT SUPPORT! I am unwilling to whore out America for a paycheck. NEGOTIATE MY CONTRACT.....that's it. Leave the commie stuff to the Chinese etc.

Turn off the Faux News, or at the very least do some research in terms of "commies" and "socialists". You just make yourself look bad. If communists ran the Union, they would be pushing for equal pay across all workers, be it loader/unloader, sorter, driver, etc. And if they were socialists, then they would be pushing for a community wide "ownership" of the company, where service is not meant for profit, but the "good of the country". We would deliver to basically break even and provide the greatest service we could for all involved to flourish as much as possible.
 

Omega man

Well-Known Member
No, the politics of the Union matter more than me having this job. You read that right. I do vote. I have voted against the current regime every time. And yes, not "somehow" the enemy.....I don't like them and believe I would not be fairly represented if necessary. Selling out what I consider my American way(I'm talking about commies, liberals, socialist etc.) demands the highest resistance. Lastly, if all that truly mattered was being in the Union........why is it commie, socialist, liberal Democrat?

Our Union, yes You are part of it, generally support the Democrats because they generally support Labor. Many different groups support the Democrats for other reasons. This does not mean that each supports each other. Our Union only cares about Labor.
How is our Union communist, socialist or liberal? You probably forgot that the Teamsters supported Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 84.
 

104Feeder

Phoenix Feeder
First, I support unions and I absolutely believe that you make more money and get better benefits because you are in a undion.

But, from my perspective there is also an imbalance.

Last I looked, greater than 95% of Teamster PAC money goes to democrats. Certainly, you have a right to contribute as you see fit. But I'm not sure how well that distribution matches the political distribution of the membership.

OK I see where the disconnect is happening.

Teamster D.R.I.V.E. is our Political Action Committee (PAC). It stands for Democrat Republican Independent Voter Education. This is a separate contribution that a member must pledge via a separate pledge card. So the simple answer is: Don't want any of your money going to Teamster political purposes? Don't sign up for D.R.I.V.E.

As to the 95%, if you read about D.R.I.V.E. they are unaffiliated with any particular party and only are concerned about candidates favorable to Labor issues. This would pretty much guarantee 95% would be Democrats. I'm unaware of any PACs that survey their members to see where their money should go. The PAC adopts a position and you either contribute or don't. I can't stand the environmental movement so none of my donations go to the Sierra Club although I love the wilderness, clean water etc.

About DRIVE | International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT)

So to the OP, sleep better knowing your money isn't going directly towards political purposes unless you are a member of D.R.I.V.E. If you happen to be a member, just fill out another card and put your contributions to "$0". Problem solved.

As to the Teamster Magazine, it's purpose is mostly for organizing, then legal notices, and plenty of pro-Labor propaganda which shouldn't be surprising. I might skim through it but if I find something interesting I do my own research instead of relying on it for factual information just as I would any mailer from a campaign, PAC, etc. They posted the covers online here:
Teamster Magazine Archive | International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT)

and I'm guessing the current Anti-Romney one is causing the trouble. You have to go back to Jan/Feb 2009 to find Obama on the cover, and he's on the two before that (Nov/Dec Oct/Sept 2008) which makes sense because that is right before the election. Teamsters, just like Police Associations/Unions, Fire, etc will endorse a candidate. I don't think this endorsement means much because other than mailing crap to your home and maybe a robocall or two it's not like Guido is visiting you at midnight to 'encourage' you to vote the right way. I'm sure if you get carpal tunnel from throwing the Teamster rag along with all the other political junk mail in the trash you will have plenty of groups to sue for your injury.
 

purplesky

Well-Known Member
Yes, I'm a Teamster-for 30 years. However, I'm 180 opposed to probably 100% of their politics. I don't like the local(local). I'm not a Democrat, commie, socialist, liberal, gay or other myriad fringe groups. And yet, my dues go directly against my very being. I'm paying to cut my own throat. Yet, you have the whole contract thing and getting your job back.......I mentioned this to a fellow feeder driver the other day and he's pretty much quit talking to me(a quasi BA wanna be). I've been eyeing that $70(whatever it is)dues and pretty much figure I'd be sold down the river by my local if anything ever happens as they have shown to be very punitive against anyone who has a chance to take away their big suv's and plush gig. I'm fully vested and if, I'm walked out the gate.......I'm ready? BTW-I happen to like alot of the fellow teamsters. Like them personally. Although the ultra teamster all or nothing guys.......can be real a-hole, forget who pays your fat salary....forget where you came from types. Thanks.

You make like $30.00hr and have a decent pension,7 weeks of vacation,free health insurance, a pretty good 401k, and you are BITCHING about union dues that annually = 1 paycheck. Dude wake the hell up! or just quit UPS and go work for Walmart or Chic-Filet or Target. They will love your right-wingnut being to death. :wink2:

You cant have it both ways Brother. The people that supposedly define your being HAVE A GOAL AND THAT IS TO DESTROY ALL THE UNIONS. Maybe you should retire in China and make iphones for $2hr.

Go work for a non-union company that supports Romney. And make sure you mail back all those pension checks YOU WILL BE GETTING FROM THE TEAMSTERS!
 
Last edited:

104Feeder

Phoenix Feeder
That latest Teamster magazine has a complete accounting disclosure in the back that shows that none of our dues are allocated for political purposes.
 

rod

Retired 22 years
That latest Teamster magazine has a complete accounting disclosure in the back that shows that none of our dues are allocated for political purposes.

They don't even send me the Teamster magazine anymore. All I get from them is a monthly ckeck and even that is direct deposit. ($405,000.00 and counting so far)
 

brown_trousers

Well-Known Member
That latest Teamster magazine has a complete accounting disclosure in the back that shows that none of our dues are allocated for political purposes.

Thats good! No one should be forced to support a political party as a condition of employment... Which would be the case in non-RTW states if the Teamsters used your union dues for political purposes. But since they don't, we shouldn't have anything to complain about
 

no more than 9

"Livin' the Dream"
I thought GP Hoffa's comparison of Mitt Romney to Pol Pot was an accurate description of the candidate. I was even more impressed by the reaction of the sheeple at the speech.
 
Top