change the subject.....typical M.O of the liberal.Corporate welfare costs twice as much as social welfare.
At least corp welfare helps the economy .Corporate welfare costs twice as much as social welfare.
change the subject.....typical M.O of the liberal.
If by which you mean the receivers of the government's largess, yes.At least corp welfare helps the economy .
At least corp welfare helps the economy .
I don't anymore. Not enough deductions. No debts, no expenses, house is paid down enough, taxes ain't worth it. I get more outta my taxes, anymore, if I just take standard.
Yes, we have worked it up sideways, upside down, inside out...there just ain't no way, here anyway, to itemize.
the middle class and the poor should unite against the rich, instead of being turned against one another by the rich.
That's one of those lies that have been repeated so many times people believe it.Never happen---the middle class has spent a lifetime subsidizing the poor and are tired of it.
Never happen---the middle class has spent a lifetime subsidizing the poor and are tired of it.
No it isn't.It's still the taking from the one who earned it and giving it to the one who didn't!
Maybe it's you that has broadened the term CORPORATE WELFARE that no longer understands the term.I think you did not understand @wkmac's response.
Just like "scab"Maybe it's you that has broadened the term CORPORATE WELFARE that no longer understands the term.
Just like "scab"
Maybe.Just like "scab"
BingoMaybe.
But I only know 1 definition for SCAB.
A jerk that crosses a picket line to work.
I don't know. Seems to have worked well for Exxon-Mobil, most farmers, etc.....
I think they made all of their own money.I don't know. Seems to have worked well for Exxon-Mobil, most farmers, etc.....