You are the one saying that tweet was fake.
The Tweet shown is not factual.
You are the one saying that tweet was fake.
The Tweet shown is not factual.
Let me know how I can possibly prove that something doesn’t exist. I’ll be waiting for you to get back to me..You are the one saying that tweet was fake. Proving it is on you.
No you were asking me to prove your falsehood.Let me know how I can possibly prove that something doesn’t exist. I’ll be waiting for you to get back to me..
Smh
If there’s a law, show me the law.No you were asking me to prove your falsehood.
Depends on whether the court says what they want to hear no matter their political affiliation.What the court says about it won't matter to some here. That's the whole point.
And if there isn't then you have nothing to worry about.Show me the law. You can't because there isn't one.
I have nothing to worry about, in any case. I’m not counting on a fraudulent lawsuit to overturn an election.And if there isn't then you have nothing to worry about.
chain of custody is clearly pointed out. And admittedly broken under oath in court.Show me the law. You can't because there isn't one.
That’s a procedure manual, not a law. To this point no one has proven that the chain of custody was broken..chain of custody is clearly pointed out. And admittedly broken under oath in court.
View attachment 411567
View attachment 411568
I didn't know the Democrats had filed another fraudulent lawsuit. Or is that frivolous? Hard to tell with Democrats.I have nothing to worry about, in any case. I’m not counting on a fraudulent lawsuit to overturn an election.
Up to the court to decide.That’s a procedure manual, not a law. To this point no one has proven that the chain of custody was broken..
Up to the court to decide whether a procedure manual is the law? In any case, the chain of custody was not broken.Up to the court to decide.
Of course. I clearly remember every Democratic initiated lawsuit being tossed out or lost.I didn't know the Democrats had filed another fraudulent lawsuit. Or is that frivolous? Hard to tell with Democrats.
Hmmm, noticed that manual came from the AZ Secretary of State with the heading "AZ election laws and publications." I'm guessing the manual contains the procedures set forth by the AZ legislature. I.E. the law.That’s a procedure manual, not a law. To this point no one has proven that the chain of custody was broken..
Too bad the county recorder did testify under oath today that the chain of custody was broken.Up to the court to decide whether a procedure manual is the law? In any case, the chain of custody was not broken.
chain of custody broken in Maricopa county - Google Search
www.google.com
So Democrats never filed lawsuits about voter suppression in various southern states? What happened to those suits?Of course. I clearly remember every Democratic initiated lawsuit being tossed out or lost.
Too bad the county recorder did testify under oath today that the chain of custody was broken.
fixed if for youTrump was the one who called for the Constitution to be set aside, ( in light of the collusion between the FBI and liberals to steal the election) as well as called for the Electoral College to be abolishedas he said it was a Disaster in 2012.
Try again,thanks for playing
government fraud and no provisions in the constitution to address itTrump was the one who called for the Constitution to be set aside,
not trueas well as called for the Electoral College to be abolished
whut ?as he said it was a Disaster in 2012.