According to Steve Bannon, Kari Lake is the “governor-elect of Arizona.”

[Jiangshi]

Well judging by the evidence submitted today, there will be a new election.


Kidding, no evidence submitted

 

[Box Ox]

Well judging by the evidence submitted today, there will be a new election.


Kidding, no evidence submitted

Wow. Didn’t see that coming.

 

[newfie]

Wow. Didn’t see that coming.

so you just accept someone else's comment if its what you want to hear?

 

[Box Ox]

so you just accept someone else's comment if its what you want to hear?

I’d accept yours too. Was evidence submitted?

 

[newfie]

I’d accept yours too. Was evidence submitted?

its ongoing. what do you think about the printing issues discussed today?

the lake team has an expert in that testified to a corruption of the printed ballots that affected the electronic system ability to count them. It sounds like a legitimate argument but I'm not sure what or how many votes it affected.

Now I'm not a lawyer but I believe an expert witness testifying would be considered evidence. do you have a different understanding?

 

[728ups]

Kari Lake sending out a blizzard of tweets acting like today went well. Her people will buy it. Then when the judge rules against her, it will be another example to them of a corrupt Deep State judge ignoring their “evidence.” I watched it. It was a clown show.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

You realize no one is calling for termination of the Constitution, right?

Yes, I do. It's Democrats who are pushing the silly lie that Trump said that.

 

[newfie]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605682256185462784

 

[newfie]

 

[newfie]

expert testimony on printing issues . I believe expert testimony is considered evidence?

 

[oldngray]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605693082158059523

 

[Box Ox]

View attachment 411613

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605719112927219713

 

[newfie]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605719112927219713

you seem to have missed my earlier point. and dont get me wrong I've often said here that overturning an election result is almost impossible.
but with that said can we now agree that evidence has been admitted in this trial by credible witnesses
one a forensic expert and two an expert with 30 years of experience?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605719112927219713

105,000 faulty ballots.

Are you still going to say you don't know whether that election was handled well?

 

[Box Ox]

105,000 faulty ballots.

Were they not counted?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Were they not counted?

You didn't answer the question.

Half of ballots were faulty in the largest county.
Do you think that is an election that was handled well?

 

[Box Ox]

You didn't answer the question.

Half of ballots were faulty in the largest county.
Do you think that is an election that was handled well?

Clearly not. But where's Kari's case?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Do you think that is an election that was handled well?

Clearly not.

Thank you.
Maybe next time you shouldn't spend so much time making fun of people who want fair elections.

 

[newfie]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605682256185462784

View attachment 411613

expert testimony on printing issues . I believe expert testimony is considered evidence?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605693082158059523

Clearly not. But where's Kari's case?

 

[Box Ox]

You didn't answer the question.

Half of ballots were faulty in the largest county.
Do you think that is an election that was handled well?

Clearly not. But where's Kari's case?

Thank you.
Maybe next time you shouldn't spend so much time making fun of people who want fair elections.

You're welcome. I tried to stick strictly to the relevant parts of the conversation for as long as I could. Kari has no case.