Bible discussion: Sola Scriptura or Prima Scriptura? “On topic”

Discussion in 'Life After Brown' started by Integrity, Dec 9, 2019.

  1. Integrity

    Integrity Binge Poster

    I tried to buy into “Sola Scriptura” for years but I have settled on “Prima Scriptura” as the correct view of the Bible for me to take with regards to my walk of faith.

    Any thoughts or comments regarding this post or the topic of the thread would be most interesting to me.

    Peace.
     
  2. Indecisi0n

    Indecisi0n Well-Known Member

    I am on team Prima as well .
     
  3. Integrity

    Integrity Binge Poster

    Thanks for contributing!
     
  4. upschuck

    upschuck Well-Known Member

    Never heard those terms, what are they?
     
  5. Integrity

    Integrity Binge Poster

  6. upschuck

    upschuck Well-Known Member

    Prima sounds like you can believe what you want, as long as someone, somewhere has written it down, and confirms what you want to believe, and that there is no absolute truths.
     
  7. rod

    rod #1 on Upstates "list"

    All I know about religion is that more people have been killed fighting over it than any other reason there is.
     
  8. 542thruNthru

    542thruNthru Well-Known Member

    I thought life after brown was a non on topic sub forum?
     
  9. Integrity

    Integrity Binge Poster

    This is not the topic but since you are confused I will respond and not report it off topic.

    However if others get confused and try to make this issue of the thread then I will be forced to report it off topic.

    It is my understanding that Life After Brown forum covers a wide range of non-UPS topics however it still allows for threads to be requested to be “On Topic”.

    That is my thought at least.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2019
  10. burrheadd

    burrheadd KING Of GIFS

    depends on who’s sitting at the mod desk
     
  11. Integrity

    Integrity Binge Poster

    Do you have a view of the Bible?
     
  12. rod

    rod #1 on Upstates "list"

    I believe----I just don't believe in organized religion--its nothing but a big business that gets all the tax breaks.
     
  13. UpstateNYUPSer

    UpstateNYUPSer Well-Known Member

    Are you asking if I can see it or are you asking me for my opinion on it?
     
  14. Integrity

    Integrity Binge Poster

    I wasn’t actually asking you anything. I was actually responding to a reply to this thread from @rod.

    I do welcome your contribution to the topic of this discussion thread however.

    Sincerely,
    I
     
  15. Integrity

    Integrity Binge Poster

    I can understand your position. Thanks for contributing to this discussion.
     
  16. zubenelgenubi

    zubenelgenubi Well-Known Member

    I don't believe in either completely. When you seek the truth you will find it, whether it be in scripture, nature, your own contemplation, that of others. Scripture can be interpreted to fit any agenda, true or not. There are numerous versions and translations of the Bible. You can choose to accept a figure of speech in the Bible as literal, if you want.

    An idea among biblical scholars that seems to be gaining traction is that the early Jews were actually pantheistic. Elohim, Yahweh, and Jehovah can actually be taken as names of different gods. There is a version of the Bible that presents the scripture as such, called the Name of God version.

    Many of the versions we have today are based on the canonized version of the Bible established by the council of nicea, which was done under the direction of the Holy Roman Emporer, and declared the Gnostics to be heresy. So, It's kinda up to you to decide which version you will accept, but that doesn't change the truth.
     
  17. Integrity

    Integrity Binge Poster

    Well said.