Actually that was the idea of our founders. I think they did the best possible job man could do in ratifying documents that provided for the best opportunity at achieving these goals. Quite frankly we have done a superb job in screwing up what was presented to us.
I think the answer lies in your "less than satisfactory" statement. I suspect when we go to a universal healthcare system the layer of government bureaucracy will give an even larger less than satisfactory outcome for most of us.
Aren’t you in poor health in your fifties and currently without health insurance? Why do you think the system is working at peak efficiency?
Because he is a Great American!
The system didn't give me poor health. And that's life. I can see why those without a belief system want to hang on as long as possible but in the end we'll all die and there are no guarantees we'll die comfortably. And given how we now have medicines that prolong life it'll probably mean years of chronic pain and burden to our families. Some have the genetic luck to be spry until their 90's, many of us don't. The government can't guarantee good quality of life, but if it spends too much it will make us elderly a burden on everyone else. And it's clear from just postings here that the young already resent us. So buck up and accept the inevitable.
It's just a bunch of liberal PETA snowflakes crying about not eating meat.
I'm gonna show this to dogs on the route!
Kill the stupid dog first at least. Don't boil it alive.
I'm hungry now thanks.
I love it when socialists paint this wonderful picture of government controlled anything and then promise cheaper prices and the same level of care except everyone gets it!
It’s all censored and boring. Why do I care about blurry things with no sound getting hit by a blowtorch? Show me the real deal.
