No, that does not make you a racist. Would you like to explain why it is suggested that she has not been investigated because it would be racist? You posted the article. Maybe she's paying off the investigators, Washington style. Why do you think race plays any part of it? As you pointed out, they went after Rangel. So it isn't about "when" she will, but "why" she hasn't and you seem to think it must be race.
I don't give a gosh darn if she's green..................what is wrong with this "body" (congress) when they don't do what they are suppose to do. They did it with Rangel, even though they took their sweet time about it. You keep bringing up race.........it's becoming a pain in the ass and I'm sick of it. Anything I complain about a person isn't because of their color....it's usually about their scrambled brains and their stupid ideas that they must babysit the citizens.
So now we are blaming the House leader from 2 years ago?
No, I'm saying she was in charge and friendailed to do her job. She did her job with Rangel, but ignored her responsibilities to see it through with Waters. She, herself should've been facing censure!!
It's too late for Boehner and Cantor to do it? Why?
You still haven't answered, moreluck.
Because they are having fun with Paul Ryan's budget.
