Democrats that support Communism....why?

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Uncle Rick won't be happy until the troops of a President to the left of Mao are goose stepping down Pennsylvania Avenue.
and you dont understand that voting for a lesser evil like obama and biden and doing nothing else is leaving you with bigger evil every 4 years.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
With ya there. Voted for Obama twice and would always vote for him over Trump.




Agree. Not a good idea to blow your stimulus wad during a good economic period.




Of course they're not. Who said that?




Hope so. This isn't a good look for the left or its media outlets.

View attachment 307848
CNN supported the iraq war. not left wing. they have commercials too.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
A headline that says OJ Simpson was "mostly peaceful" the night he murdered his wife wouldn't necessarily be wrong either.
no your logic is off. you can go to a protest and have 99% of the people protesting peacefully and 1% burning a car or building and its still mostly peaceful. that could be what happened in that photo. its just where the journalists chose to shoot was not reflective of the facts. fire on the screen is very sensationalist and profitable for capitalist news media.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
no your logic is off. you can go to a protest and have 99% of the people protesting peacefully and 1% burning a car or building and its still mostly peaceful.

That's why CNN was able to say the "protest" was mostly peaceful. Personally, I don't think a protest is "mostly peaceful" if 95 people are actually protesting while another 5 are breaking windows and setting their surroundings on fire and nobody is telling them it's wrong or trying to stop them.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
That's why CNN was able to say the "protest" was mostly peaceful. Personally, I don't think a protest is "mostly peaceful" if 95 people are actually protesting while another 5 are breaking windows and setting their surroundings on fire and nobody is telling them it's wrong or are trying to stop them.
people obviously will tell them its wrong so that nullifies that part. 95% is mostly peaceful.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
That's why CNN was able to say the "protest" was mostly peaceful. Personally, I don't think a protest is "mostly peaceful" if 95 people are actually protesting while another 5 are breaking windows and setting their surroundings on fire and nobody is telling them it's wrong or trying to stop them.
even 70% is mostly peaceful. 60 is debatable, technically it is, but thats not a huge majority.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Oh, is that what's actually happening on the ground?

Nonsense. LOL
yea people talk at protest including to cops telling them to join and stop police violence. see people who have a more mature political philosophy than your own, know that violence can discredit a movement.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
so you think people are silent LOL?

Just assuming people are speaking out against what they're hanging out feet away from does not make it so.


even 70% is mostly peaceful. 60 is debatable, technically it is, but thats not a huge majority.

If five 5-man crews of "protestors" were firing cannons at store fronts instead of burning them down while 75 protesters stood around them doing nothing it also wouldn't be a "mostly peaceful" protest. You can't simply point to the numerical majority and use their behavior to explain what's actually happening.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Just assuming people are speaking out against what they're hanging out feet away from does not make it so.




If five 5-man crews of "protestors" were firing cannons at store fronts instead of burning them down while 75 protesters stood around them doing nothing it also wouldn't be a "mostly peaceful" protest. You can't simply point to the numerical majority and use their behavior to explain what's actually happening.
dude people are going to speak out. not everyone, some people will say nothing or be afraid to speak out.

it would still be mostly peaceful. you need to look up the definition of "mostly"
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Good documentary

Yeah?

Keanu Reeves Didn’t Know The Matrix Was a Trans Allegory

"Two decades after The Matrix was originally released, codirector and cowriter Lilly Wachowski finally revealed the franchise was a trans allegory. “That was the original intention,” she told Netflix in August, adding that she kept mum about it largely because the “corporate world wasn’t ready for it.” The revelation isn’t new to superfans of The Matrix, who have long viewed the film through that particular allegorical lens after Lilly and her sister, Matrix codirector and writer Lana, came out as trans after the franchise wrapped up. But it’s brand new to star Keanu Reeves, who played Neo in the series."
 
Top