Express handing resi deliveries to Ground

McFeely

Huge Member
^ Sad but probably true.

My first couple of peak seasons with Express I was out way past dark. It's a game changer, and productivity goes down a huge amount when you can't find addresses easily. Better someone else than me do it.
 

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
^ Sad but probably true.

My first couple of peak seasons with Express I was out way past dark. It's a game changer, and productivity goes down a huge amount when you can't find addresses easily. Better someone else than me do it.
GroundCloud makes it pretty easy. You just zoom in and see that it’s the 2nd house from the corner or whatever. You can still hit 20+ stops per hour in the dark. Safety is a bigger concern for me, more people home so more cars parked on the street and lower visibility. It’ll be a challenge.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Right there...no one is pushing anything back onto the parents. It's their responsibility. And in case you haven't noticed the pro-choice people say it's the woman's right, not the parents. A guy could want to keep his child and the woman says too bad. And a person deciding as an adult to join the military has nothing to do with abortion. The problem with all of you socialists is you want a nanny state holding everyone's hand.
If you cluckers want people to be more self reliant and personally responsible and no government interference in their private lives doesn't that include you people staying out of decisions pertaining to a woman's body and her reproductive rights? Yes or no.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
For a man who claims to be a Christian you certainly put your liberalism first.
I’m asking you because I’m trying to see if you truly believe that abortion is indeed murder. If it is, then I don’t know how prosecution wouldn’t be appropriate. Because it was legal? Doesn’t that just make the state and the doctors co-conspirators with the mother?
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
GroundCloud makes it pretty easy. You just zoom in and see that it’s the 2nd house from the corner or whatever. You can still hit 20+ stops per hour in the dark. Safety is a bigger concern for me, more people home so more cars parked on the street and lower visibility. It’ll be a challenge.
GroundCloud with the night mode makes it downright relaxing after dark.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
I’m asking you because I’m trying to see if you truly believe that abortion is indeed murder. If it is, then I don’t know how prosecution wouldn’t be appropriate. Because it was legal? Doesn’t that just make the state and the doctors co-conspirators with the mother?
You can't prosecute if it's legal. Even if it was made illegal you couldn't go back and prosecute those who did it while it was legal. It's reprehensible. It's immoral. But it's the law of the land and the only way to get that to change is to convince enough people that it's wrong to do. Slavery was once legal too. Did that make it morally ok?
 

Cactus

Just telling it like it is
Raj has said Fedex believes people want their residential deliveries after they get home from work. It’s crazy, but that won’t stop it.
raj-koothrappali-1-380.jpg
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
If you cluckers want people to be more self reliant and personally responsible and no government interference in their private lives doesn't that include you people staying out of decisions pertaining to a woman's body and her reproductive rights? Yes or no.
Doesn't stop you from getting involved with your support now does it?
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
You can't prosecute if it's legal. Even if it was made illegal you couldn't go back and prosecute those who did it while it was legal. It's reprehensible. It's immoral. But it's the law of the land and the only way to get that to change is to convince enough people that it's wrong to do. Slavery was once legal too. Did that make it morally ok?
Well let’s think like a movie lawyer. Murder is a state charge because “My Cousin Vinny” made that clear. Violation of Civil Rights is an offense to be prosecuted at the federal level as supported by the case of “Mississippi Burning”.

Now it seems that Roe v. Wade proclaimed a constitutional right to abortion for the woman. But did that right supersede the civil rights of the unborn child?

It seems ridiculous until you look at a seemingly unrelated common place happening in drug cases. Drug dealers are often charged with violating the drug stamp act. So in the commission of an illegal act, drug dealers routinely break a law that if they tried to obey, they would self incriminate for the crime of drug dealing.

So is it the case that in committing a state crime of “murder” that the federal government has sanctioned, the court also allows for the violation of civil rights of the unborn? If abortion is indeed murder that is legal, it’s commission necessitates the the federal violation which is not legal.

Therefore, abortion, legal or not over the years, is proof of civil rights violations of millions.

If abortion is murder, why would these women not be tried for violating the rights of the unborn?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Well let’s think like a movie lawyer. Murder is a state charge because “My Cousin Vinny” made that clear. Violation of Civil Rights is an offense to be prosecuted at the federal level as supported by the case of “Mississippi Burning”.

Now it seems that Roe v. Wade proclaimed a constitutional right to abortion for the woman. But did that right supersede the civil rights of the unborn child?

It seems ridiculous until you look at a seemingly unrelated common place happening in drug cases. Drug dealers are often charged with violating the drug stamp act. So in the commission of an illegal act, drug dealers routinely break a law that if they tried to obey, they would self incriminate for the crime of drug dealing.

So is it the case that in committing a state crime of “murder” that the federal government has sanctioned, the court also allows for the violation of civil rights of the unborn? If abortion is indeed murder that is legal, it’s commission necessitates the the federal violation which is not legal.

Therefore, abortion, legal or not over the years, is proof of civil rights violations of millions.

If abortion is murder, why would these women not be tried for violating the rights of the unborn?
And yet people who kill pregnant women are charged with the murder of the unborn child also. Roe v. Wade gave women, and the medical staff performing the abortion, an exemption from prosecution. And as long as it's the law of the land they'll continue to get away with murder. As I've stayed before you may have an argument when a fetus is a clump of cells. But as tried recently to establish in Missouri, when the fetus has it's own heartbeat then certainly it should be looked at as an independent life worthy of protection. Abortion advocates are pushing for abortion at any time, not because the fetus is dead or horribly deformed, but because they advocate it's the woman's right to choose whether to take her baby to term. And to kill viable babies who survive abortion attempts because it wasn't the mother's intent to let that baby live. Abortion opens up quite a few ethical issues that haven't been addressed by the law but abortion advocates are trying to get codified to prevent any challenge to the right to an abortion.
 

Rick Ross

I'm into distribution!!
All the welfare mom's that have 5 kids to 5 different daddies?

I agree this is an issue but I also have a problem with people who make $25k a year who have 6 kids. They are subsidized by their church membership and tax credits.

My son wanted to get more reps pitching last summer so we signed him up for summer baseball in a church league. Over half his team was homeschooling and most had never played an organized sport. My son actually felt sad for these kids because they were so sheltered.

One of the parents told my wife her son was homeschooled because she didn't want her 9yo to see a trans kid in his restroom at school. She was quiet when my wife told her his school had private restrooms in every classroom and, that to the best of her knowledge there are no identity challenged children in the school.
 
I agree this is an issue but I also have a problem with people who make $25k a year who have 6 kids. They are subsidized by their church membership and tax credits.

My son wanted to get more reps pitching last summer so we signed him up for summer baseball in a church league. Over half his team was homeschooling and most had never played an organized sport. My son actually felt sad for these kids because they were so sheltered.

One of the parents told my wife her son was homeschooled because she didn't want her 9yo to see a trans kid in his restroom at school. She was quiet when my wife told her his school had private restrooms in every classroom and, that to the best of her knowledge there are no identity challenged children in the school.
And how are those kids are going to be prepared for the real world?
 
Top