Occupy Wall Street

804brown

Well-Known Member
"It’s funny; the Big Lie has a long pedigree. A year or so ago, I was leafing through Ron Chernow’s indispensable history of the Morgan financial interests, and found this interesting exchange between FDR and Russell Leffingwell, a Morgan partner and Washington fixer, a sort of Robert Strauss of his day. It dates from the summer of 1932, with FDR not yet in office:

“You and I know,” wrote Leffingwell, “that we cannot cure the present deflation and depression by punishing the villains, real or imaginary, of the first post war decade, and that when it comes down to the day of reckoning nobody gets very far with all this prohibition and regulation stuff.” To which FDR replied: “I wish we could get from the bankers themselves an admission that in the 1927 to 1929 period there were grave abuses and that the bankers themselves now support wholeheartedly methods to prevent recurrence thereof. Can’t bankers see their own advantage in such a course?” And then Leffingwell again: “The bankers were not in fact responsible for 1927–29 and the politicians were. Why then should the bankers make a false confession?”

This time, I fear, the public anger will not be deflected. Confessions, not false, will be exacted. Occupy Wall Street has set the snowball rolling; you may not think much of OWS—I have my own reservations, although none are philosophical or moral—but it has made America aware of a sinister, usurious process by which wealth has systematically been funneled into fewer and fewer hands. A process in which Washington played a useful supporting role, but no more than that.

Over the next year, I expect the “what” will give way to the “how” in the broad electorate’s comprehension of the financial situation. The 99 percent must learn to differentiate the bloodsuckers and rent-extractors from those in the 1 percent who make the world a better, more just place to live. Once people realize how Wall Street made its pile, understand how financiers get rich, what it is that they actually do, the time will become ripe for someone to gather the spreading ripples of anger and perplexity into a focused tsunami of retribution. To make the bastards pay, properly, for the grief and woe they have caused. Perhaps not to the extent proposed by H. L. Mencken, who wrote that when a bank fails, the first order of business should be to hang its board of directors, but in a manner in which the pain is proportionate to the collateral damage. Possibly an excess-profits tax retroactive to 2007, or some form of “Tobin tax” on transactions, or a wealth tax. The era of money for nothing will be over."
 

804brown

Well-Known Member
You mentioned earlier about housing starts being up..................and we have a glut of 18.5 million???? Is Obama building these homes? Sounds like his business sense.

Housing "starts" are up. The glut is in already built houses. " Is Obama building these homes?" Yes, of course he is. Because he wants the economy to go into a tailspin and his communist minions take over this country. Right?? Am I close here?? I lose tract of you loony righties and your wacky theories about Obama.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Housing "starts" are up. The glut is in already built houses. " Is Obama building these homes?" Yes, of course he is. Because he wants the economy to go into a tailspin and his communist minions take over this country. Right?? Am I close here?? I lose tract of you loony righties and your wacky theories about Obama.
Simply speaking, wouldn't building more house just add to the inventory? That'd be like spending more money to get yourself out of debt. Where have I heard that before? It's not a whacky theory....I was a realtor, it's just common sense.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
180804.JPG
 

UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)

Well-Known Member
Maybe it's time to cut off the unemployment benifits so some of these clowns will go get a job!!!!!

Take it back to 40 weeks....I'm for that!!!

There are some states that have what they call "work share" which supplements an underemployed person's weekly wage by paying the difference between what they are making and what they had been making at their previous job. They also supplement the weekly wage of employees who have their hours reduced.

I think traditional unemployment should only last 26 weeks.
 
Top