PobreCarlos
Well-Known Member
soberups;
What "additional facts and information"? What "facts" were presented in the first place? What has there been to "believe"...other than a few posts someone typed here on BC? Beyond, that, it's not like a requested an unreasonable amount of evidence; just some facsimile (or a link to same) of the source the poster maintains he's quoting from. Is that so hard to provide? Sorry, but I'm not quite ready to automatically accept someones possibly second or third hand relation of events as "facts" when it would be so easy to simply DEMONSTRATE what actually ARE the "facts".
That said, I'm glad you're so conversant with my employment status in 1997, when I made my mind up, and so on. Are those "facts" that one's equally supposed to accept based on the say-so of an individual such a yourself? If so, I can't help but wonder how you came to be so "knowledgeable"?
What "additional facts and information"? What "facts" were presented in the first place? What has there been to "believe"...other than a few posts someone typed here on BC? Beyond, that, it's not like a requested an unreasonable amount of evidence; just some facsimile (or a link to same) of the source the poster maintains he's quoting from. Is that so hard to provide? Sorry, but I'm not quite ready to automatically accept someones possibly second or third hand relation of events as "facts" when it would be so easy to simply DEMONSTRATE what actually ARE the "facts".
That said, I'm glad you're so conversant with my employment status in 1997, when I made my mind up, and so on. Are those "facts" that one's equally supposed to accept based on the say-so of an individual such a yourself? If so, I can't help but wonder how you came to be so "knowledgeable"?