Rittenhouse Trial

upsgrunt

Well-Known Member
An active shooter, according to the Department of Homeland Security, is “an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area.” By this definition—and to the crowd that tried to disarm Rittenhouse— Rittenhouse should have qualified. But the defense argued that he wasn’t, in part because he walked two blocks between his first shooting and his second shooting.

Does Mathboi qualify?
 

Lineandinitial

Legio patria nostra
1637857389148.jpeg
 

BlackFriday

Please remove my account. This forum sucks.
An active shooter, according to the Department of Homeland Security, is “an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area.” By this definition—and to the crowd that tried to disarm Rittenhouse— Rittenhouse should have qualified. But the defense argued that he wasn’t, in part because he walked two blocks between his first shooting and his second shooting.
Your ability to understand written words, sentences etc is extremely fogged up by your liberal way of thinking. Men are not to be reasoned out of an opinion that they have not reasoned themselves.
Your mind is closed tighter than duck butt.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
An active shooter, according to the Department of Homeland Security, is “an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area.” By this definition—and to the crowd that tried to disarm Rittenhouse— Rittenhouse should have qualified. But the defense argued that he wasn’t, in part because he walked two blocks between his first shooting and his second shooting.

A jury followed the actual evidence presented in the case and found Kyle not guilty. And yet here you still are, deep throating the prosecution and MSM's lie-gushing arguments that the outcome of the case wasn't the right one. Pathetic.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
A jury followed the actual evidence presented in the case and found Kyle not guilty. And here you are, still deep throating the prosecution and MSM's lie-gushing arguments that the outcome of the case wasn't the right one. Pathetic.
He directly copy pasted from slate.com, what else would you expect.
 

BlackFriday

Please remove my account. This forum sucks.
A jury followed the actual evidence presented in the case and found Kyle not guilty. And yet here you still are, deep throating the prosecution and MSM's lie-gushing arguments that the outcome of the case wasn't the right one. Pathetic.
I think he be just rattlin the cage and stuff.
 
Top