For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The right way is not to hide behind religion.False choices lead to bad outcomes. Yes the United States has been less than perfect since its inception, and so has every citizen. We might as well point the finger of guilt at ourselves when were calling out folks. And I would rather get my moral correction at church privately than have another flawed individual take some sort of moral high ground as if they have discovered the fountain of perfection. There is a right way to do this folks.
The people of the 60's had more morals in general than the people of today and then came Madlyn Murray O'hare and all went to hell!My faith teaches personal responsibility, not one and done. The cowards are the ones that never consider modifying their behavior to some moral or ethical standard. The ministers that marched back in the 60's had moral street credibility.
Which people? The ones trying to uphold Jim Crow laws in the south? The ones electro shocking homosexuals? Are those the "morals" you miss?The people of the 60's had more morals in general than the people of today and then came Madlyn Murray O'hare and all went to hell!
The people of the 60's had more morals in general than the people of today and then came Madlyn Murray O'hare and all went to hell!
Hear that moreluck?Have you experienced Jim crow laws or been electro shocked? Probably not. You got 2 choices take the sword like a proud Japanese solider or put your gun away because its not that bad in this country anymore.
Which people? The ones trying to uphold Jim Crow laws in the south?
Isn't it interesting how the racist Dems of the mid 20th century all became Repugs in the late 20th century? Now in the early 21st century we have a Repug president who embraces the the worst form of racism imaginable?not sure have to ask the dems bout that one
36 minutes of some D*bag ranting nonsense.
Are you even capable of discussion without making it partisan? My comment was about the alleged moral superiority of people in the 60's. It's nonsense to assert people that believed in "separate but equal" are morally superior to people today.not sure have to ask the dems bout that one
Are you even capable of discussion without making it partisan? My comment was about the alleged moral superiority of people in the 60's. It's nonsense to assert people that believed in "separate but equal" are morally superior to people today.
So that's a no. Were I of voting age in the 60's I don't believe I would have supported the democrats. Your point is stupid.are you capable of understanding your sides history with the KKK and the Jim Crow laws? when you get beat with your sides legacy you whine about partisan responses.
Are you capable of understanding that those same racist Dems are now racist Repugs?are you capable of understanding your sides history with the KKK and the Jim Crow laws? when you get beat with your sides legacy you whine about partisan responses.
Try and stay in the here and now right @trickpony1....are you capable of understanding your sides history with the KKK and the Jim Crow laws? when you get beat with your sides legacy you whine about partisan responses.
So that's a no. Were I of voting age in the 60's I don't believe I would have supported the democrats. Your point is stupid.