Turdferguson
Just a turd
Firing of Obama-Appointed U.S. Attorneys Isn't Scandalous | RealClearPoliticsAh. @Old Man Jingles is full of crap again eh?
They all do it
Firing of Obama-Appointed U.S. Attorneys Isn't Scandalous | RealClearPoliticsAh. @Old Man Jingles is full of crap again eh?
That is normal. The current resignations because of direct interference in sentencing of convicted Trump campaign members is not normal. They resigned in protest.
Do they do it right after the president’s buddy is convicted?
That is normal. The current resignations because of direct interference in sentencing of convicted Trump campaign members is not normal. They resigned in protest.
I misunderstood what y'all were talking about, I thought you were talking about him replacing them when he came into officeDo they do it right after the president’s buddy is convicted?
That’s because @Old Man Jingles had conflated the two in order to defend President Trumpflake.I misunderstood what y'all were talking about, I thought you were talking about him replacing them when he came into office
...and you're confusing being fired with resigning because you're blinded by TDS.That’s because @Old Man Jingles had conflated the two in order to defend President Trumpflake.
Specifically for Aaron Zelenski, I have no idea ... I'll accept your word on that.It’s not an accurate portrayal of the people involved. Aaron Zelenski worked for the Maryland AG Rod Rosenstein. He wasn’t appointed by Obama. He’s a career prosecutor that clerked for conservative judges on his way up. Pretending he’s an Obama holdover is nonsense.
Ah. @Old Man Jingles is full of crap again eh?
Now I'm confused.That’s because @Old Man Jingles had conflated the two in order to defend President Trumpflake.
If Trump had replaced all them in 2017, they would not have resigned now?That is normal. The current resignations because of direct interference in sentencing of convicted Trump campaign members is not normal. They resigned in protest.
The people resigning worked with Robert Mueller on the Democrats' first coup attempt.Specifically for Aaron Zelenski, I have no idea ... I'll accept your word on that.
I was talking more about the way things were jammed down Republicans throats the first two years. Senate rules changed , no compromise. Never been a fan of one party rule...…..but having said that Trump and his cronies have taken it a new level of dickery( don't know if that is a word or not)Specifically for Aaron Zelenski, I have no idea ... I'll accept your word on that.
My comment was meant 'in general' and I still stand by that and as @Turdferguson pointed out, "I blame Harry Reid and Obama for what is going on today in Washington DC , during the first two years of his administration", Obama gutted the political appointees made by Bush.
You do have a vast and extensive vocabulary.I was talking more about the way things were jammed down Republicans throats the first two years. Senate rules changed , no compromise. Never been a fan of one party rule...…..but having said that Trump and his cronies have taken it a new level of dickery( don't know if that is a word or not)
We're use to that!I misunderstood what y'all were talking about, ...
So ing spectacular my vocabula…………….I have the bestYou do have a vast and extensive vocabulary.
I feel I am still rightWe're use to that!
No problem.
Should a person get 9 years for lying to investigators, if indeed he did, because he's Trump's friend?Do they do it right after the president’s buddy is convicted?
He was found guilty. That is the sentencing guideline for his crimes. They have guidelines so prosecutors don’t try to make it up as they go.Should a person get 9 years for lying to investigators, if indeed he did, because he's Trump's friend?
That's what they recommended. Prove that sentencing guidelines state 9 years for lying to investigators. Whole thing was an attempt to break him to say something about Trump. Including showing up at his door with dozens of armed to the teeth federal agents in body armor and armored vehicles while magically CNN was there to record it all. Is that your idea of justice?He was found guilty. That is the sentencing guideline for his crimes. They have guidelines so prosecutors don’t try to make it up as they go.
And the Justice department decided the failed Mueller investigation prosecutors were not following those guidelines, and made their own suggestion to the court.He was found guilty. That is the sentencing guideline for his crimes. They have guidelines so prosecutors don’t try to make it up as they go.
He was tried and found guilty in a court of law. That’s what I call justice. The president pressuring the attorney general to interfere is not what I would call justice.That's what they recommended. Prove that sentencing guidelines state 9 years for lying to investigators. Whole thing was an attempt to break him to say something about Trump. Including showing up at his door with dozens of armed to the teeth federal agents in body armor and armored vehicles while magically CNN was there to record it all. Is that your idea of justice?