"undiscriminant legal purchase power to the stupid, criminal and legally mentally unstable as it stands now."
Your quote. There are laws against what you posted. The problem is that there are not enough laws, but the enforcement of those laws.
My personal view is that if a convicted criminal uses a gun in another crime, it should add at least 20 years of actual time to what ever the other crime might hold. And if someone actually gets hurt or killed, an automatic death sentence.
While we are on the subject, it is those poor liberal bleeding hearts that cry when a poor misguided criminal has two strikes, then goes and steals a beer for his third strike. They feel like going to jail for life over a beer is wrong. My take is that all these years they have taken the teeth out of time to serve, and what you say you dont really mean. After all, a 99 year sentence only means I have to serve 24, and maybe with good behavior I can be out in 7.
When criminals understand that if they use a gun, regardless of what happens, they WILL be in deep DOO DOO.......
Susie is kinda like a driver here that is a real tree hugger yelling about the people that trash the roadway with cans and bottles. But when I asked him what about the cigarette butts he allways throws out the door, or the ashtray he dumps on the gas station parking lot, that of course is another thing entirely. BTW, have you ever noticed at intersections they are in places several inches deep until the rain comes and washes them into our lakes and streams.
And please dont confuse the main stream NRA with photos the likes of what has been linked to on this thread. The vast majority of NRA members are much like you and I.
I am against laws that limit rights of any kind to the individual. But then again, I believe in the old saying, your rights stop when they interfere with my rights. The one thing here is the consideration on my part to the rights of others. Too many people have lost that fundamental responsibility of respecting others rights.
That is where Susie and I differ. She makes sweeping statements that she has gathered from sound bites, and then applies them to a situation or phrase that has very little to do with the soundbite.
But then liberal people that have been complaining about us not paying what the rest of the world has been paying for oil, should be glad that it is nearing $3 a gallon. Their self projected guilt, for what ever reason, is their problem, not mine.
It is also funny how they take great offence at someone else making refrence to something racist and raising hell about it,then when they say something that is very racist, they try and ignore those that might take offence at it.
So equality is something they want to talk about and demand that we all adhear to the principle, but that does not apply to them personally.
d