Anyways, it all could have been prevented with "social help".
Something, most on here don't understand and don't want to.
Do you really think someone should get a check by simply walking in the door and asking for it?
As was said, there is more to this story that isn't being told. There are requirements for eligibility and a need for personal information.
The article said the first time she applied for assistance she didn't provide all the info requested, then came back months later with a gun.
Before you come on here and slamming people for not understanding, the least you could do is actually read your source information.
The source did mention she was trying for months !
If you want to interpute that into a 1 time try and a 1 time denial, that's up to you.
I know you'll need more proof.
I can't provide other than the article itself.
Like the Herman Cain case - Women can't be trusted, they all lie !
The source did mention she was trying for months !
If you want to interpute that into a 1 time try and a 1 time denial, that's up to you.
I know you'll need more proof.
I can't provide other than the article itself.
Like the Herman Cain case - Women can't be trusted, they all lie !
Texas Health and Human Services spokeswoman Stephanie Goodman said the woman first applied for assistance in July.
Goodman said the mother was denied because she didn't submit enough information.
Goodman said the mother called the office in mid-November to check on her case. That was apparently the last time she tried contacting the state before the shooting, Goodman said.
Must be a Canadian word.interpute?????
interpute?????
Nice twist on the story from government officials.
Of course they won't tell what happened between July and November.
It's only December now.
But keep on dreaming if you think she only tried to get food stamps (assistance) once and way back in July.
Make up your mind Klein. Was the article correct or was it not correct? This is just one more example why people on here don't take you serious.
First you're all fired up because according to YOUR source the state denied her assistance and when the very same source shows it was the woman that failed to provide the needed info, the state is lying. HAHAHAHA.....think before you post Klein. Better yet, just don't post.
Yes, I've dealt with the IRS, I pay my taxes yearly, No I have never been audited by the IRS.Have you ever dealt with the IRS and been under an audit ?
Maybe she went thru the same hell with them at social services ?
Yes, I've dealt with the IRS, I pay my taxes yearly, No I have never been audited by the IRS.
Maybe she did, maybe she didn't. The only thing you or I know about this story is what was printed in your article. You condemn me for offering an alternative scenario on Herman Cain, yet feel very comfortable doing the same thing here. You didn't answer my questions. Does your government require certain information before giving assistance?
Then instead of going to Texas from Ohio she should have went to Canada, it would be closer anyway.To answer your question :
Very little info.
I have done it in the past for roomates and tennants, just signing a piece of paper that they own rent.
And they get a cheque almost immediatly.
Certin peeple have a very hard time wit speling.Must be a Canadian word.
"As Ronald Reagan noted in 1968, “We should measure welfare’s success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added.” He also stated in 1970 that “welfare’s purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.” Unfortunately, the federal welfare system fails to accomplish this purpose. Welfare reforms that promote work are key to achieving the goal of helping those in need become once again self-reliant and independent."
Food Stamp Fraud Costing Taxpayers Billions