floridays
Well-Known Member
I guess the purge is on
STEVE BANNON: FBI CONDUCTED AT LEAST 35 RAIDS ON TRUMP ALLIES YESTERDAY
STEVE BANNON: FBI CONDUCTED AT LEAST 35 RAIDS ON TRUMP ALLIES YESTERDAY
Last edited:
Sounds like another fishing expedition.
With a huge net, I hope they don't catch one of those right whales of those animal activists will set their asses on fire.Sounds like another fishing expedition.
Don't worry, they never catch the wrong whales.With a huge net, I hope they don't catch one of those right whales of those animal activists will set their asses on fire.![]()
![]()
Wasn't Tucker Carlson the one who's lawyers said his show was strictly for entertainment purposes and no one shoud be expected to take it seriously? Asking for a friend
So you're saying no facts are ever given on Tucker's show? Just because a strategy was used to get out of a bogus lawsuit? Okayyyyy.....Wasn't Tucker Carlson the one who's lawyers said his show was strictly for entertainment purposes and no one shoud be expected to take it seriously? Asking for a friend
And we know who you consider to be a reputable source.I think @floridays has been duped by believing Steve Bannon.
There has been absolutely nothing on this from a reputable source.
Who are these 35-50 Trump allies that were visited by the FBI, and why haven't any of them spoken out?And we know who you consider to be a reputable source.
No. Fox News' lawyers cited precedent from a case where MSNBC lawyers argued that. Then the case was thrown out and the left wing judge went on a pathetic rant in her judgement because she was upset she had to declare Fox News the winner.Wasn't Tucker Carlson the one who's lawyers said his show was strictly for entertainment purposes and no one shoud be expected to take it seriously? Asking for a friend
According to Bannon
as usual you are wrong, i guess the voices in your head lied to you once again. It 's rather funny when Fox admits what we all knew: Tucker Carlson is full ofNo. Fox News' lawyers cited precedent from a case where MSNBC lawyers argued that. Then the case was thrown out and the left wing judge went on a pathetic rant in her judgement because she was upset she had to declare Fox News the winner.
Nice try though son.
i'm saying his own lawyers and a judge said hes full ofSo you're saying no facts are ever given on Tucker's show? Just because a strategy was used to get out of a bogus lawsuit? Okayyyyy.....![]()
The quotes of Fox News lawyers are literally them quoting case precedent from the MSNBC case. Which is what I just said. They cited case precedent and the whore's lawsuit was thrown out.as usual you are wrong, i guess the voices in your head lied to you once again. It 's rather funny when Fox admits what we all knew: Tucker Carlson is full of
Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" takes the primetime host Tucker Carlson seriously, a new court filing said.
Fox News asked the judge to toss out McDougal's case by arguing that "Carlson's statements were not statements of fact ..........
Fox News argued that Carlson "cannot be understood to have been stating facts, but instead that he was delivering an opinion using hyperbole for effect," the ruling said.
It added that Fox News "submits that the use of that word or an accusation of extortion, absent more, is simply 'loose, figurative, or hyperbolic language' that does not give rise to a defamation claim."
US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer ' any reasonable viewer arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes
i proved my point old boy, you need to brush up on your reading skills. the judge and his lawyers said he's full ofThe quotes of Fox News lawyers are literally them quoting MSNBC lawyers. Which is what I just said. They cited case precedent and the whore's lawsuit was thrown out.
Do you ever get tired of being wrong about everything?
Your point was that you're ignorant and gullible?i proved my point old boy, you need to brush up on your reading skills. the judge and his lawyers said he's full of![]()