Forced? Let me get this straight, you are complaining about fitting a meal period in a 3 hour gap? Do you really need more time to figure out when to pull over, eat and rest? I just don't get it. Union members should be forced to see how and why these laws are in place today so they are not taken for granted........ Please make time for yourself bro!
You just said it all when you said it. What other worker in the entire US does not take a lunch break around noon (that would be your 3-6 hour window)? Its only at UPS that workers (mostly rookies) are so pressured that they feel they can't stop for even 5 minutes to swallow a doughnut or inhale a sandwich. What makes it worse is that management from corporate down to your on-road sup want it this way because they know many people will run their lunch making their numbers look better than they should.
Here the contract says lunch between the 4th and 5th hour which is not enforced except during OJS rides and there is an important reason for this. If a route is 80-100% house calls it really doesn't matter when you take your lunch. However if a route is 60% and up business it really makes a difference in the driver's favor to take lunch between the 4th and 5th hour. Just 60% business means you have to shut it down when you could be doing house calls before pick-ups and saving miles driving back to the house call area that would be completed if your took your hour lunch at the end.
It gets more profound if the route is 90-100% business. It means if you start at 845 and pickups start at 1430 you need to start lunch no later than 1344 but pick-ups start at 1430 so you need to be clean by 1330 and start lunch at that time. If you can't clean its not your problem (just be prepared to be under the microscope for performance) its your center team's and no matter how hard you work or even how hard two people on car work hypothetically we all know there are going to be many days in a month that you can't clean by 1330.
The problem is many drivers don't have the baseballs to call and say they can't clean or don't want someone sent from a house call route 2 towns away (this would make me feel very guilty) that is dispatched with 200 stops to finish his business for him and punch out at 1830 when the poor soul that helped is punching out at 2030. I guess management looks at it as punishment for both drivers for following the contract.
The sad part about these 95% business routes is that they are always under 8 on paper and management starts playing with his route and making him do very inefficient things to make him 8 hours on paper. Delivering an apartment complex out of a 24-footer on his way back to the center is just one of the brilliant ideas they have come up with.
Why can't they just accept the fact that the route will never equal 8 hours and eat that? Why do they have to send him to do 15 house calls in a 24 footer making his paid day close to 10 hours when they could have paid him 8.5 and someone in a p700 .5 to do the 15 stops on route and save all the miles costs?
It simply doesn't make any sense to me unless the center manager doesn't have an actual cost sheet/breakdown. If he actually has to manage the costs and is shown these costs monthly then the under 8 on paper should be left to be. If he doesn't see these costs and only has to manage the routes as stops/car, under 8, over 9.5, and over 10's then I can see his logic. However, this begs the question: how can UPS operate this way on purpose with such large inefficiencies?