Police Brutality & Executions

trickpony1

Well-Known Member
but on the other hand, you rally for convicted murderers as if they were stand up citizens.

There is a clear and distinct difference between an entitled little black girl that doesn't understand concepts like "consequences for one's behavior" and "it's illegal to scam off someone else's pool party" and an American soldier in a combat zone who has an enemy combatant trying to get his sidearm.

It's a shame, in all your infinite wisdom, that you are unwilling or unable to differentiate between the two.

Bad wars, good warriors.
Good pool parties, entitled bad kids (who apparently don't know any better.).

BTW....three more of the Leavenworth Ten have been paroled. Put that in your pipe and suck on it.
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
More good news from McKinney Texas, as the woman who was the SPARK that turned out to be the chaos at the McKinney pool party has been suspended from her job pending an investigation.

Tracey-Carver-Allbritton, was the white woman who began shouting racial slurs at the kids as she tried to get them to leave the pool area and was captured on film making racially charged comments like "why dont you go back to your section 8 housing"....

Then, she is the ONLY person captured on video being violent, striking a female teenager and pulling her hair, yet she was not arrested by the white police officers.

The video is being reviewed by the McKinney Police department and she should end up being charged with an assault and battery offense.

http://madamenoire.com/539432/white-women-involved-in-mckinney-pool-fight-suspended-from-job/

In the meantime, Bank of America and its subsidary have reviewed the video containing this racist maroon and they have taken action.

Corelogic:
“CoreLogic does not condone violence, discrimination or harassment and takes conduct that is inconsistent with our values and expectations very seriously. As a result of these pending allegations, we have placed the employee in question on administrative leave while further investigations take place.”

Ultimately, she will either be fired or resign.

They should put her in a cell, nearest the majority of black female inmates and try to pull off her racist rants there.

Good luck with that.

TOS.
I watched that video and I heard nobody say anything about section 8 .
Do you have another video that confirms it ?
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
Wrong use of the word, but that wouldnt matter to you.. I already commented on the host of the party, attempting to have a party without proper permissions, but the host DID live there, DID have access to that pool, and DID have authority to invite guests, just not the number that showed up.

This happens all the time in suburban neighborhoods with community pools.

The only difference, is that in the rest of normal america, community pool arguments dont end up with psycho cops running around like maniacs..

Maybe if the host had cleared the party with the parents first, then the association and the neighbors, this wouldnt have happened.

Unfortunately, kids dont think that far down the road.

But then again, neither do you.

You would rally against these black teens, because they in a white neighborhood committing no crimes, but on the other hand, you rally for convicted murderers as if they were stand up citizens.

You really need a reset button bro.

TOS.
From what I have read , the illegal party was on a lot next to the pool and a mother was having a end of school party for 4th graders .
It was the illegal party goers that caused all the chaos .
 

UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)

Well-Known Member
are you really THAT much of an ass?

Suppose it was your daughter that was the victim of his inability to control himself? Would you be more sympathetic and perhaps put your arm around his shoulder knowing what he had been to prior to responding to that call, forgetting about the fact that he threw her to the ground for no good reason whatsoever?

Being a cop is a tough job and part of that job is being able to push everything else aside and focus on the task at hand. This officer clearly did not have the ability to do this.

wkmac put it best when he asked if UPS would be less inclined to discipline one of us if we had screwed up due to something that had happened earlier in the day.
 

rod

Retired 22 years
Suppose it was your daughter that was the victim of his inability to control himself? Would you be more sympathetic and perhaps put your arm around his shoulder knowing what he had been to prior to responding to that call, forgetting about the fact that he threw her to the ground for no good reason whatsoever?

Being a cop is a tough job and part of that job is being able to push everything else aside and focus on the task at hand. This officer clearly did not have the ability to do this.

wkmac put it best when he asked if UPS would be less inclined to discipline one of us if we had screwed up due to something that had happened earlier in the day.


That being said-----you're still an ass
 

Sportello

Well-Known Member
Nope. He didn't listen to the cops and they couldn't tell his toy gun wasn't real because he had removed the orange tip to make it look more real.
Two shots fired within two seconds of the police rolling up in a reckless manner, and you are blaming the kid? Watch the video. The cop came out firing before the kid could even react.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
There is a clear and distinct difference between an entitled little black girl that doesn't understand concepts like "consequences for one's behavior" and "it's illegal to scam off someone else's pool party" and an American soldier in a combat zone who has an enemy combatant trying to get his sidearm.

It's a shame, in all your infinite wisdom, that you are unwilling or unable to differentiate between the two.

Bad wars, good warriors.
Good pool parties, entitled bad kids (who apparently don't know any better.).

BTW....three more of the Leavenworth Ten have been paroled. Put that in your pipe and suck on it.


You are correct. There is a GINORMOUS difference between the two. The first one involving the little black girl committed NO CRIME and suffered NO CONVICTION for her actions, and the HERO's you rally for were ALL CONVICTED IN A COURT OF LAW and SENTENCED to LEAVENWORTH HIGH SECURITY prison because they are a danger to our society at LARGE.

Seems like you hold the little black girl (your description) to a higher standard of morality, than you do CONVICTED murderers who killed in cold blood and attempted to conceal evidence after LYING about the circumstances.

Your racial annimous is the ONLY thing that is clear from your post and positions.

We get it, you dont like BLACKS, and anything they do is an automatic conviction in your book absent of facts or actual laws broken.

But when it comes to WHITES, as long as they are in uniform, they can act like ANIMALS and kill innocent human beings for pleasure or a drunken rage, and YOU will call them hero's.

You need your head examined.

TOS.
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
You are correct. There is a GINORMOUS difference between the two. The first one involving the little black girl committed NO CRIME and suffered NO CONVICTION for her actions, and the HERO's you rally for were ALL CONVICTED IN A COURT OF LAW and SENTENCED to LEAVENWORTH HIGH SECURITY prison because they are a danger to our society at LARGE.

Seems like you hold the little black girl (your description) to a higher standard of morality, than you do CONVICTED murderers who killed in cold blood and attempted to conceal evidence after LYING about the circumstances.

Your racial annimous is the ONLY thing that is clear from your post and positions.

We get it, you dont like BLACKS, and anything they do is an automatic conviction in your book absent of facts or actual laws broken.

But when it comes to WHITES, as long as they are in uniform, they can act like ANIMALS and kill innocent human beings for pleasure or a drunken rage, and YOU will call them hero's.

You need your head examined.

TOS.
So what's your take about a white woman claiming to be black , runs a chapter of the NAACP and the National NAACP office approves of her ?
Do you think her head needs to be examined ?
 

trickpony1

Well-Known Member
Hey TOS-
Sgt. Derrick Miller is black.

He was convicted and sent to Leavenworth allegedly for the same circumstances that Behenna is said to have done.....that being the killing of an enemy combatant that went for Miller's sidearm.

My signature line doesn't say "Release the Leavenworth Ten except for Sgt. Miller who is black.".

What do you have to say now?

Bad wars, good warriors.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
Hey TOS-
Sgt. Derrick Miller is black.

He was convicted and sent to Leavenworth allegedly for the same circumstances that Behenna is said to have done.....that being the killing of an enemy combatant that went for Miller's sidearm.

My signature line doesn't say "Release the Leavenworth Ten except for Sgt. Miller who is black.".

What do you have to say now?

Bad wars, good warriors.

Amazing how convenient EACH of these murderers used the "he was trying to get my sidearm" defense during their trials and convictions.

To you however, its a believable defense, because you support murderers and would like them to be loose on our streets.

How about the Army sniper, who raped 4 iraqi young men while at an sniper FOB and said each of the young men tried to go for his side arm?

He pled GUILTY and was sparred the death penalty.

Of course, you would drape him in an american flag and give him a parade around Rural america where the average intelligence level is 5th grade.

TOS.
 

wkmac

Well-Known Member
Bad wars, good warriors.

That saying justifies the actions of Nazi soldiers, Soviet soldiers and Japanese soldiers among others.

Being an order follower which enables bad wars doesn't grant moral justification for the actions taken. Following the orders that create the bad war makes the enabler bad also.

Seems to me you might want to rethink your saying.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
That saying justifies the actions of Nazi soldiers, Soviet soldiers and Japanese soldiers among others.

Being an order follower which enables bad wars doesn't grant moral justification for the actions taken. Following the orders that create the bad war makes the enabler bad also.

Seems to me you might want to rethink your saying.

"Think" would be the operative word in the sentence and to "Re-think" would suggest he thought about it in the first place.

TOS.
 
Top