Nope, if I had a child I would've supported it. I knew a guy at church that got one of his employees pregnant. He refused to acknowledge the kid. Girl left state to live with relatives so Tennessee dropped paternity suit. She sent him pics, saw them, boy was clearly his. I would never do that, I'd take care of my child. But I would have gotten her pregnant in the first place. If you give people a safety valve, whether it's abortion or putting it on the state to raise the child, many will take advantage of it. The stigma of having a child out of wedlock used to discourage women from getting involved in risky behavior. Some still did of course. But it wasn't just a stigma because of the church, but it also put a financial burden on families. So for the most part people married much earlier and had kids. Today too many want to have freedom to do as they please, and there's no pressure to marry young. But they still want sex. Abortion is the escape valve because too many aren't responsible. And you think the state should take their responsibility off their hands if there's no abortion. Might be a period of adjustment, but soon people will realize getting pregnant is on them, their responsibility. And if they do get pregnant they'll have to deal with it.