So...there wasn’t a covert CIA operation going on at the time?B.S. She lied that they were angry about a blasphemous YouTube video instead of saying it was jihadists carrying out an attack on anniversary of 9/11. Nothing to do with whatever they were doing in Libya.
Your welcome. There’s a nice little timeline that should clarify things for you.Thank you.
To quote Hillary, what difference does it make? Jihadists knew Americans were there and Susan Rice had to explain why the attack on Americans no matter why they were there. Saying it was over a video doesn't cover up a covert operation. If she said it was an attack on anniversary of 9/11 that doesn't expose operation either. However telling everyone that his policies have got ISIS and Al-Qaeda under control then have this attack right before the election isn't good optics. So they put the blame on some YouTube guy who incensed locals to violence against Americans by insulting the prophet.So...there wasn’t a covert CIA operation going on at the time?
No. Her disgust is not for the dead Americans. It is for the senator use of the dead Americans.
Go back and watch the entire segment. Its obvious that she’s annoyed with the senator’s questions, not with the fact that four men died.
Oh yeah, I agree with that ... that was pretty obvious.
Are we playing charades?
Oh yeah, I agree with that ... that was pretty obvious.
I think her comments mirrored her lack of action
Everything, and I do mean everything, going on in Washington these days is due to Hillary losing to Trump. So she's not only relevant now, but everything she was doing that ultimately led to her defeat is relevant. And the Clinton foundation hasn't been cleared, and she and Bill used their influence to get investigations dropped.Can I remind you again that your Hillary arguments are irrelevant? She isn't president, and holds no public office. She is a non-factor, except as a straw woman to take the heat off the fool Trump.
Benghazi weakened her campaign, and the Comey email announcement was a gift that handed Trump the election. The Clinton Foundation was cleared, there is no Uranium One, and she has simply become a beacon for Right Wing excuses for the idiot who became president by cheating the system.
Pathetic.
Literally everything in Washington these days is about Hillary losing to Trump. So she not only remains relevant but anything she did that may have caused her to lose remains relevant too. Harrumph, harrumph!!Can I remind you again that your Hillary arguments are irrelevant? She isn't president, and holds no public office. She is a non-factor, except as a straw woman to take the heat off the fool Trump.
Benghazi weakened her campaign, and the Comey email announcement was a gift that handed Trump the election. The Clinton Foundation was cleared, there is no Uranium One, and she has simply become a beacon for Right Wing excuses for the idiot who became president by cheating the system.
Pathetic.
In your twisted mind maybe.Everything, and I do mean everything, going on in Washington these days is due to Hillary losing to Trump.
Literally everything in Washington these days is about Hillary losing to Trump!!
Seriously. You really just said “It’s all Hillary’s fault!”Everything, and I do mean everything, going on in Washington these days is due to Hillary losing to Trump. So she's not only relevant now, but everything she was doing that ultimately led to her defeat is relevant. And the Clinton foundation hasn't been cleared, and she and Bill used their influence to get investigations dropped.
Literally everything in Washington these days is about Hillary losing to Trump. So she not only remains relevant but anything she did that may have caused her to lose remains relevant too. Harrumph, harrumph!!
This whole Trump collusion conspiracy is based on a proven false dossier that she paid for. And the attempt was made to use it to spy on him in hopes of obtaining anything that could get him impeached. Our political process of the peaceful transfer of power is in jeopardy with this kind of intrigue. Those that hunger for wealth and power so much that they jeopardize the entire country shouldn't be supported whether they are in my party or yours.Seriously. You really just said “It’s all Hillary’s fault!”
You can’t possibly mean that when you actually think about it.
This whole Trump collusion conspiracy is based on a proven false dossier that she paid for. And the attempt was made to use it to spy on him in hopes of obtaining anything that could get him impeached. Our political process of the peaceful transfer of power is in jeopardy with this kind of intrigue. Those that hunger for wealth and power so much that they jeopardize the entire country shouldn't be supported whether they are in my party or yours.
And let's dispel the notion that the reason they're investigating Trump-Russian collusion is because of what Trump has done.Ok. Then let’s dispel with this notion that this is all because of Hillary.
If you say so. I think there was plenty of reason based on his actions and associations. But you don’t get to disregard law breaking because you don’t agree with why the investigation started.And let's dispel the notion that the reason they're investigating Trump-Russian collusion is because of what Trump has done.
Supposedly the FBI office in Little Rock is looking into it. But to date we know Hillary did commit felonies, and a FBI lawyer under oath testified that the Obama DOJ told the FBI to stand down on investigating her. To date Donald Trump has not been charged with anything impeachable. You can allude to law breaking all you want, but nothing, nada, zilch so far.If you say so. I think there was plenty of reason based on his actions and associations. But you don’t get to disregard law breaking because you don’t agree with why the investigation started.
And by the way, you, vantexan have insisted that Hillary is being investigated as well so I guess it’s all good. Supposedly you claim she’ll soon be led away in hand cuffs. We’ll see.
Donald Trump does not have to be charged to be impeached.Supposedly the FBI office in Little Rock is looking into it. But to date we know Hillary did commit felonies, and a FBI lawyer under oath testified that the Obama DOJ told the FBI to stand down on investigating her. To date Donald Trump has not been charged with anything impeachable. You can allude to law breaking all you want, but nothing, nada, zilch so far.
I think the Supreme Court might feel differently. Impeachment is for "high crimes and misdemeanors."Donald Trump does not have to be charged to be impeached.
And Nancy Pelosi just said she hasn't seen any evidence yet that would support an impeachment. And even if they do they'll never get enough support in the Senate. It would be political suicide to impeach. So go ahead!Donald Trump does not have to be charged to be impeached.