Feinstein dead....USA a better place?

[UnionStrong]

While I understand your sentiment....

I consider it a character flaw.

A mixing of weakness, hate, envy, the obtuse and a whole host of other traits. Weakness being the driving factor.

Some grow out of it, some are shocked out of it by a criminal act being perpetrated against them. But most remain entrenched in their ridiculous beliefs. Sad.

 

[Integrity]

Because liberalism is a mental disorder

Liberalism is not defined as or generally understood as a mental disorder.

Definition of LIBERALISM

 

[Thebrownblob]

Liberalism is not defined as or generally understood as a mental disorder.

Definition of LIBERALISM

I do not believe most on democrat side of the aisle are actually liberals. Leftists would be more accurate for many of them.

 

[UnionStrong]

Liberalism is not defined as or generally understood as a mental disorder.

Definition of LIBERALISM

Then why do they support policies that will eventually destroy them? Sounds like insanity. Open borders, men competing with women in sports, puberty blockers for kids, drag queens and sexually explicit books in elementary schools. Claiming there are more than 2 sexes. I haven’t even mentioned the imbecilic foreign policy or domestic energy policy. If all that sounds good to you, you’re just as crazy as the loons on the left.

 

[newolddude]

Feinstein's mixed legacy is crazy:
-was one of the first ones in the room and found Moscone and Milk's dead bodies
-flew the Confederate flag and prosecuted the man that tore it down
-trailblazing female Senator
-got rich while doing so
-basically said "Let them eat cake" after she bought George Lucas' mansion and another is Aspen Colorado

 

[Integrity]

Then why do they support policies that will eventually destroy them? Sounds like insanity. Open borders, men competing with women in sports, puberty blockers for kids, drag queens and sexually explicit books in elementary schools. Claiming there are more than 2 sexes. I haven’t even mentioned the imbecilic foreign policy or domestic energy policy. If all that sounds good to you, you’re just as crazy as the loons on the left.

I understand your strong feelings about these things. I was just providing a published definition of liberalism.

 

[UnionStrong]

I understand your strong feelings about these things. I was just providing a published definition of liberalism.

Do you support those things?

 

[Integrity]

Do you support those things?

I do not support or agree with most of them. But I judge no one who participates or supports in things that I don’t support.

 

[bacha29]

You can spend on all those items without overspending. The problem is you Democrats want to overspend because that's where the skimming and graft happen. Waste, abuse, and fraud is alive and well in Washington.

One thing you keep ignoring is the nation's ageing population and their present and future needs. You keep hollering for spending cuts but continue to fail to identify the specific areas where those cuts should be made while at the same time and by your own admission are counting off the days until you qualify for Social Security and Medicare while ignoring the fact that SS , Medicare and Medicaid are part of general revenues.

This is what amuses me about so called "conservatives" . They know that they too are getting old and will need the services designed for them in order to live in a safe and dignified manner but don't have the money to pay for private care and will need publicly funded services going forward.

Yet they fail to realize that the spending cuts they demand could easily result in the loss of the services they are currently counting on.

 

[UnionStrong]

I do not support or agree with most of them. But I judge no one who participates or supports in things that I don’t support.

Typical milk toast response. Grow a set. Jesus would be whipping those bastards out of the halls of Congress. Time to choose a side.

 

[bacha29]

Hi, do you run your finances under a budget? Do you stay within it? You are liberal. Do you understand the question?

Cut Federal spending? It depends.......a good start would be to flush out all illegals and send them home. With penalties and such and perhaps a repayment of their expenses and ongoing offspring expenses etc. Explore citizenship loss of anchor babies etc.

Welfare means testing....nuff said.

Corporate welfare.

Global aid. Nuff said. This includes global defense. Trump was right....make em pay their share.

UPS trims the fat. Govt can too.

UPS doesn't have 535 people sitting on it's board of directors whose vote they have to depend on in order to implement every course of action they wish to take.

 

[Integrity]

Typical milk toast response. Grow a set. Jesus would be whipping those bastards out of the halls of Congress. Time to choose a side.

Not sure. I don’t see the halls of congress as temple.

Did Jesus throw the first stone?

I have chosen.

 

[bacha29]

The problem with your economics....no limit. No penalty. No consequences. This sort of thinking dominates and festers in blue states and cities. No limits. You are liberal. Spending and confiscating other folks money at the point of a gun. This is settled doctrine and history. This is communist/socialist/liberal/Democrat religion.

It's good to know that when you reach your old age that's if you haven't already done so you will have accumulated enough personal wealth whereby you will not need any publicly funded senior services because you can purchase them off the open market and can pay for them yourself thereby will not need any public services born out of legislation those evil communist liberal Democrats passed into law.

 

[UnionStrong]

Not sure. I don’t see the halls of congress as temple.

Did Jesus throw the first stone?

I have chosen.

Whatever dude.

 

[PoirotAtUPS]

Absolutely.

Unfortunately while she spent decades impeding progress in this country while growing richer and richer - they will find a worse version to replace her.

 

[vantexan]

One thing you keep ignoring is the nation's ageing population and their present and future needs. You keep hollering for spending cuts but continue to fail to identify the specific areas where those cuts should be made while at the same time and by your own admission are counting off the days until you qualify for Social Security and Medicare while ignoring the fact that SS , Medicare and Medicaid are part of general revenues.

This is what amuses me about so called "conservatives" . They know that they too are getting old and will need the services designed for them in order to live in a safe and dignified manner but don't have the money to pay for private care and will need publicly funded services going forward.

Yet they fail to realize that the spending cuts they demand could easily result in the loss of the services they are currently counting on.

First off while SS and Medicare taxes go to general revenue they do so with an "I.O.U." from the government. The taxes are collected separately from income taxes. Secondly because of profligate spending by our government the SS trust fund will be depleted by 2033 if not sooner. So when you ask just what would I cut, it doesn't matter. The government's mishandling will result in at least a 22% reduction in SS benefits because at that point benefits will only be paid by payroll taxes and company matches. Thirdly, in spite of the warnings of icebergs in the water it's full speed ahead for you. It's your type who are destroying us, not my type saying watch out for icebergs. Because the overspending you advocate enables the waste, fraud, and abuse that make it so easy for your type to skim off the top.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I do not believe most on democrat side of the aisle are actually liberals. Leftists would be more accurate for many of them.

They are neomarxists.

 

[vantexan]

Not sure. I don’t see the halls of congress as temple.

Did Jesus throw the first stone?

I have chosen.

God, while mulling over what to do, glanced over at Integrity and asked "What do you think?" Integrity, sitting on his haunches with his arms crossed and palm fronds waving above his pillowed couch, said "I have chosen." God looked over at Jesus, rolled his eyes, and said "OK, we'll do it your way. Anything goes!"

 

[UnionStrong]

God, while mulling over what to do, glanced over at Integrity and asked "What do you think?" Integrity, sitting on his haunches with his arms crossed and palm fronds waving above his pillowed couch, said "I have chosen." God looked over at Jesus, rolled his eyes, and said "OK, we'll do it your way. Anything goes!"

He is his own god, apparently. He cherry picks what he likes, for he is holier than thou. Lol

 

[vantexan]

He is his own god, apparently. He cherry picks what he likes. But he is holier than thou. Lol

He's on par with God because he can take or leave whatever he feels like. Must be nice.