dudebro
Well-Known Member
I just want to say that wasn't meant to be a personal criticism by any means. Like I said, it sure seems like you guys mean well.
But I would like to know what you guys mean by management not trying to implement the "plan." I see supervisors tripping over themselves (usually while performing union work) trying to stay under their allotted man-hours. I've been told that staffing is just one of the things IE "plans."
I'm not trying to point fingers here. Please help me understand the big picture of what IE's purpose is in a typical day-to-day operation.
We are (or have been) a company that does a lot of the same thing every day. So everything we do is broken down onto basic movements and measured, under average (not perfect) conditions. Along the way, this has helped us become very efficient.
Used properly, the variance to an IE measured time can illustrate where we have a problem, in setup, methods, or conditions. This way, we don't waste time looking where a problem isn't. In other words, there has to be some kind of scientific base for a good job.
The business plan really isn't what IE does, upper management does that. IE is there to say, yes, this is or isn't physically possible under average conditions. We also should develop methods that minimize cost and effort.
Regarding the 1DA, there's no question loading it in the car is the best plan. Where we don't do it, it's because we don't execute some other part of the plan, so we can't TRUST that we won't have a 1 day air "found in load".
Last edited: