If the distributors of the film are not doing it for the money why then isn't the corporation structured as a non profit? And how much of it's profits has Angel Studios committed to the task of combating child sex trafficking?Says the fellow who accused the makers and stars of the movie as being in it only for money, are pushing Christianity, are anti gay and trans. Without having seen the movie no less.
I know it troubles you, but there are a lot of minority folks who support Trump. There are people of color running for president as Republicans. Meanwhile the Dems have two old white men and an older white woman running.
You see Van, because both Angel Studios and it's venture capital backers are privately owned. they don't have to disclose that information. So when privately owned cons like Angel Studios comes up with one of these little "faith based" schemes ( and they come along regularly) I and with good reason question their true intentions. Are they genuinely trying to organize a global response to the issue of child sex trafficking or have they simply recognized a certain demographic and niche market they can serve profitably?