Sportello
Well-Known Member
That was clear.Uncle Tom is a term used by jelli ones. (life is short.....say what you mean and say it clearly)
That was clear.Uncle Tom is a term used by jelli ones. (life is short.....say what you mean and say it clearly)
uncle tom is only racist if a republican uses the term.
White noise in the background.....hearing for the supreme court nominee...
Leahy (D-VT) asked the guy about no hearing for the Obama nominee of a year ago. The guy says he's not going to comment on something so political. Leahy says maybe you can't but I will and goes on to say how bad that was. These hearings are for people who like to hear themselves talk....Finestein too.
Feinstein had a fit because Gorsuch might be an originalist. She doesn't believe the Constitution means what it says.
Can you give me an example of a decision that supports your conclusion?its lazy legislation. they cant get anything through congress so they want activist judges legislating from the bench to bypass congress.
Citation please, or you are a liar.I know a couple of judges in Massachusetts that created a law out of thin air .
Can you give me an example of a decision that supports your conclusion?
Citation please, or you are a liar.
While I like and fully support the concept of the union as 2 people, it should be a Legal Union ... not marriage which is a religious concept.Gays have right to marry, Mass. SJC says - The Boston Globe
In a historic and long-awaited decision, a deeply split Supreme Judicial Court yesterday ushered in a new era of gay rights, becoming the nation’s first state supreme court to rule that same-sex couples have the legal right to marry.
In the 4-3 decision, the court’s majority ruled that the centuries-old notion of marriage as limited to a man and a woman should be updated to define the institution as the exclusive, “voluntary union of two persons as spouses.”
My word for it is "fusion".While I like and fully support the concept of the union as 2 people, it should be a Legal Union ... not marriage which is a religious concept.
Good example Baba.
Religious belief has no place in public policy. Marriage is a legal contract.While I like and fully support the concept of the union as 2 people, it should be a Legal Union ... not marriage which is a religious concept.
Good example Baba.
Agree 100%Religious belief has no place in public policy.
Don't display your ignorance.Marriage is a legal contract.
I'm not concerned with the origin of marriage. As it stands in our society it is a legal contract. TtkuDon't display your ignorance.
Google "marriage origins" to help with your ignorance.
Ignorance - lack of knowledge or information. (I helped you with that one)
Did you file the paperwork with the state? Do you files your taxes as married?I've been married 25 years but am not a religious person. Does that mean I'm not married now?
While I like and fully support the concept of the union as 2 people, it should be a Legal Union ... not marriage which is a religious concept.
Good example Baba.
I've been married 25 years but am not a religious person. Does that mean I'm not married now?
Never thought about it except in terms of "semantics".How does this fit into your definition of your own Libertarianism?
Real question...