Who else has no problem with a strike?

Why would they? It's going to be full time driving at a lower rate than regulars.

Short-sightedness, that's why. It helps them now so they don't think about 2, 3, 5 years or more down the road.

Similar to why you think it would be ok for you to deliver ground at your rate to deliver on weekends. It works for you, so it's fine. Well, it's not fine, it's a full day of ground work, it deserves ground pay.
 

llamainmypocket

Well-Known Member
Short-sightedness, that's why. It helps them now so they don't think about 2, 3, 5 years or more down the road.

Similar to why you think it would be ok for you to deliver ground at your rate to deliver on weekends. It works for you, so it's fine. Well, it's not fine, it's a full day of ground work, it deserves ground pay.

I'm not sure the profit margins are there on Saturday to facilitate the work without operating at a loss, if at full ground rate. No businesses and residentials are more spread out. I would like to see ups have a weekend presence.

From a technical standpoint my argument isnt strong but do you think I'm incorrect?
 
I'm not sure the profit margins are there on Saturday to facilitate the work without operating at a loss, if at full ground rate. No businesses and residentials are more spread out. I would like to see ups have a weekend presence.

From a technical standpoint my argument isnt strong but do you think I'm incorrect?

I'm not sure how much room there is in the margin, but you can bet that the company will correct any deficit. I'm not saying you're wrong, not telling you how you should feel, just pointing out that either you or 22.4 delivering ground isn't appropriate and is an awful precedent to set in a contract.
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
I'm not sure the profit margins are there on Saturday to facilitate the work without operating at a loss, if at full ground rate. No businesses and residentials are more spread out. I would like to see ups have a weekend presence.

From a technical standpoint my argument isnt strong but do you think I'm incorrect?

I suggested that if it is a legitimate need to have a lower cost work force to get weekend volume jumpstarted, they could make 22.4 expire at the end of the contract. At that point all 22.4 drivers would automatically become full ground drivers, as the weekend delivery operations should made profitable by then. Not a perfect solution, but better than 22.4 forever.
 
I got tired of getting paid dick by UPS, not getting hired by people despite 2 trades and 2 degrees with no drugs or criminal history. I started my own business. I worked very hard in the beginning and started with nothing so I wouldn't owe anybody anything. It has not been easy.

However, it has made work at UPS easier, knowing I'm there for spending money and health insurance. A sale or two is a months pay. I've got a regular who has spent over my yearly wage in my business.

I'm all for a strike. I got :censored2: to do.
 

1989

Well-Known Member
I know or 22 drivers that work the preload starting at 5:00 or 6:00. That would probably be all the 22.4 s working 5 hours in the preload. Doesn’t leave much time on road.
 

siouxman

siouxman
A strike is not going to happen.
They would simply renegotiate.

I swear, I don't know what you guys are drinking but you need a tall glass of reality.
It's out of our hands after the vote is done.The union can call a strike at any time.It may be remote it happens but I never thought trump would get elected either
 

siouxman

siouxman
strike or not, there is no way the rest of the shipping industry can quickly handle all our volume. small package shipping would grind to a halt the first day we walk and there's no more pickups. every company in America is on the phone to fedex or usps to schedule a pickup up at the same time or within a week or so if they get notice. lol no way is that gonna work. we would kill small internet sales companies and do considerable damage to the larger ones. we talk of how much money ups would lose but think of the collateral damage the ripple effect would cause as well.

another point about scabbing. same principle holds here. the day we walk the pickups stop. the deliveries will continue by sups and whoever might not walk (god help them) for a short while until the system is cleared out and then that's it. doors are locked. after a week or so you wanna cross and go back to work? to do what? we go back to work the day after the strike ends to empty buildings and empty trucks and start doing pickups. the amount of time it would take to get the operation back to the point where there is enough work for everybody is anybody's guess.
I think they continued to run the air during 97 but I may be wrong.The problem is after the strike.The customers don't forget and the ones we hurt will jump ship.that means less jobs loss of revenue, you get the picture.I don't think a lot of drivers know their customers as intimate as we did back in 97.I sure some do but the connection with the driver has diminished thus the support.i had signs hanging in businesses supporting drivers.will we see that this time.i do believe a strike is remote but it can happen
 

RetiredIE

Retirement is VASTLY underrated
A strike would be DEVASTATING for both the union and the company, but my concern is that the 22.4 workforce will be like crack cocaine for UPS, at the expense of normal full time drivers.
 

1989

Well-Known Member
Short-sightedness, that's why. It helps them now so they don't think about 2, 3, 5 years or more down the road.

Similar to why you think it would be ok for you to deliver ground at your rate to deliver on weekends. It works for you, so it's fine. Well, it's not fine, it's a full day of ground work, it deserves ground pay.
5 years down the road they will have 5 years full time seniority, 5 years of working 1 job (probably for less hours a day) making a good living wage, plus will have accrued $1,416 a month in their pension. And will be on track to 8500 a month in 25 years later.
 

siouxman

siouxman
A strike would be DEVASTATING for both the union and the company, but my concern is that the 22.4 workforce will be like crack cocaine for UPS, at the expense of normal full time drivers.[/QUOTEin my opion is what ups wants,a 22 4 option to reduce their labor expense and be more competive with the competion and regional carriers who also are strong competitors.we can disagree or agree on if it's a good thing but some sort of driver being paid less with a chance to move up is going to be a reality.
 

babboo25

Banned
5 years down the road they will have 5 years full time seniority, 5 years of working 1 job (probably for less hours a day) making a good living wage, plus will have accrued $1,416 a month in their pension. And will be on track to 8500 a month in 25 years later.
UPS abused many of us inside hires, I personally drove cover, comp, vacation coverage for over 4 years, no credit towards FT pension. Wish 22.4 was around then.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
5 years down the road they will have 5 years full time seniority, 5 years of working 1 job (probably for less hours a day) making a good living wage
They can do that as a regular package car driver then. We're giving the company a huge cut to their payroll expenses and getting practically nothing in return.
 
Top