I hope many will agree that some language in the 2008 contract was weak. Surepost, 9.5, harassment, to name just a few issues. seems to me we are going down the same path with this one. I asked a labor attorney in Wash. D.C. ( friend of family ) look at certain parts of our Tentative Agreement. His conclusion was that in some parts the language was "WEAK" and in some other parts it was "IRESPONSIBLE". That statement has CEMENTED my NO vote on the TA. A NO vote does NOT mean a strike. Many people think it does. All it means is that hall and our other negotiating team members have to go back to the drawing board and HAMMER out a STRONGER LANGUAGE agreement. Send a message to the IBT that we deserve stronger protective language in the contract. They still have 3 months to get it right.