well, it does explain alot, but not what yo think. it's not my english that's poor. it's that i'm so terribly lazy. and i don't know if i want that changed. actually, reading prior posts, i think you are mistaken. my english seems exemplary, lack of capitalization not withstanding. perhaps my sentence structure is a little advanced for you.
actually, there really is the sound of crickets coming from our trucks at times. there is a company that ships them to petstores in the area. i think they feed them to the fish and amphibians. so although i think you meant it as a joke, not a bad one i might add, there is factual basis for the premise.and yes, i "talk all that smack" and i have probably only slightly more regard for the "real fedex" than you. i agree with your assessment of the lack of efficiency. but (here i go talking smack again) think of all that potential. all that space to add former ups package or when fedex loses the rla and they decide to integrate ground and air we'll have plenty of room. or maybe an enterprizing contractor in your area will buy up the routes and find more efficient routing. the possibilities are endless.
i don't know if they were annoying or not. i don't stick around long enough to find out. there's so many other things to do out there than listen to crickets or drive around in a package van. i prefer golf, but to each his own. if you catch up to one of those trucks with the interesing accoustics, let me know how it sounds. i can't imaginge wanting to hang around long enough to experience it myself, but i would enjoy a trained ear such as yours giving a detailed review. and why is that cricket shipper sending anything with those fedex dogs anyway? makes ya wonder.
oh, my someone's getting sand in his panties down south of the mason dixon line.
anyway, not really sure what a "troll" is outside of LOTR or D&D, nor do i really care. just a ground ic who sees the industry different than most on this site and willing to put my $.02 worth in. probably not always appreciated, but just as valid as any other even if it does give me a negative rep. i don't think having a negative rep can really get me in trouble and i don't think i have in any way violated any codes of conduct, so i will simply continue to enjoy the spirited back and forth of this fine establishment even if you, sir, continue to display the manners of a guttersnipe
well read. but "street children" connotes a more sympathetic image than i am referencing.
oh. i believe i was referencing Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist. but wikipedia is a good read also.
oh, my someone's getting sand in his panties down south of the mason dixon line.
that's right, wage slave. whatever i say. we do indeed agree.
Takehome pay relative to actural work each of us has actually done that week? as Al Bundy would say "lets rock".
and though you continue to call the contractor model a "sham" the courts still have not come to a concensus and looking at the makeup of the supreme court, i think i like my chances there too. maybe the court decision will require congress to rewrite the IC law, and with Fred's influence there, i really like my chances.Takehome pay relative to actural work each of us has actually done that week? as Al Bundy would say "lets rock".
