Dayton Ohio Shooting

[newfie]

I was just highlighting how bourgeois it is to down talk all the “laymen” for having views.
Laymen have a history of dying for their views and helping the leader they agree with overthrow regimes.

is there a consolation prize or celebratory stage after death for dying for your views? Does our maker pin medals on our after life form?

 

[El Correcto]

gay men are so dramatic

I am not

 

[newfie]

I am not

crap, there goes another stereotype in the waste basket

 

[El Correcto]

is there a consolation prize or celebratory stage after death for dying for your views? Does our maker pin medals on our after life form?

I have 0 proof and have never read it anywhere. I like to think revolt is deeply ingrained in men, when an alpha male becomes to domineering and another alpha is ready to take over the group.

Just part of being human in my eyes.

 

[floridays]

I am not

Not at all

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Thoughts and prayers.

You know that's gonna Pee Off Big Mak !

 

[Old Man Jingles]

I think anyone should be able to own a gun to protect themselves in their homes. I do. But the accessibility of high powered rifles that angry young white guys can use to kill a load of people in moments really is nuts.

Certainly a 100-round feeder seems a bit much.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Land of the free really starting to look like some don’t deserve it

The Dimwits running for Prez certainly don't believe in it or want it.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Certainly a 100-round feeder seems a bit much.

How about 99.
How bout 50.
How bout 10.
Mind your own ing business.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

The Dimwits running for Prez certainly don't believe in it or want it.

Neither does Trump.

 

[bacha29]

You clowns are fomenting the revolution currently.
Take a bite at that plump apple.

And just exactly who are the "clowns" and just exactly what are they doing that will incite this "revolution" you speak of. ?

 

[Jkloc420]

And just exactly who are the "clowns" and just exactly what are they doing that will incite this "revolution" you speak of. ?

liberals

 

[newfie]

And just exactly who are the "clowns" and just exactly what are they doing that will incite this "revolution" you speak of. ?

 

[Fred's Myth]

Do you have a juris degree? Passed the bar exam and argued constitutional cases on those grounds? If not then it's just a layman's view of the constitution and carries with it no greater weight than the viewpoint of any other layman. TYRANNY OF IT"S OWN MILITIA? When was the last time that happened?

No, but unlike you, I have an education, and intelligence.

The Founding Fathers were basing the Constitution and its Amendments on the history and experiences of England, and attempting to assure that it didn't repeat in America.

Try reading a book sometimes, instead of listening to the voices in your head.

 

[newfie]

And just exactly who are the "clowns" and just exactly what are they doing that will incite this "revolution" you speak of. ?

just curious. you're not really that blind to the hate message that is being spewed by your side as your side accuses the other side of hate speech? are you really that blind or just taking a negative position for arguments sake?

 

[It will be fine]

No, but unlike you, I have an education, and intelligence.

The Founding Fathers were basing the Constitution and its Amendments on the history and experiences of England, and attempting to assure that it didn't repeat in America.

Try reading a book sometimes, instead of listening to the voices in your head.

Have you read Stevens dissent in Heller? What you claim is a settled interpretation of the 2nd amendment is anything but. Heller was decided 5-4. Flip one vote and the conversation changes. But I’m sure you’re a more adept legal scholar than the 4 Supreme Court justices that agreed with Stevens.

 

[BadIdeaGuy]

Have you read Stevens dissent in Heller? What you claim is a settled interpretation of the 2nd amendment is anything but. Heller was decided 5-4. Flip one vote and the conversation changes. But I’m sure you’re a more adept legal scholar than the 4 Supreme Court justices that agreed with Stevens.

Flipping that question around, are you a more adept legal scholar than the *5* Supreme court justices that don't share your view?

 

[over9five]

But I’m sure you’re a more adept legal scholar than the 4 Supreme Court justices that agreed with Stevens.

If 4 justices agreed with Stevens, he would have won.
Just sayin'...

 

[Sportello]

Connor Betts: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Damn Socialist, Satan prasing, Trump hating, Elizabeth Warren loving, white nationalist?

Oh, the tribalism in it all. smh

It’s not always about politics, in spite of you trying to spin it that way.

SMDH.

 

[It will be fine]

Flipping that question around, are you a more adept legal scholar than the *5* Supreme court justices that don't share your view?

I find his argument far more persuasive than the activist conservative justice’s decision. The point is, the conclusion is certainly debatable despite @fred's Myth’s #iamverysmart retort.