Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
It's all fun!Oh baby
It's all fun!Oh baby
DeviantIt's all fun!
And proud of it!Deviant*
* "We're not men, we're Devo!"And proud of it!
* someone or something that deviates from a norm
Akron/Kent's finest!* "We're not men, we're Devo!"
If you had been paying attention to the matter you would know that from Pa's standpoint the matter is already been settled. Ballots postmarked by election day could arrive up to 3 days later and still be counted which amounted to only a few hundred ballots well short of what was needed to change the outcome.Doesn't apply. The lawsuit is about whether judges or election officials in the four states made election rules changes which by the Constitution only allows state legislators to do. Not talking about the law you cited, talking about last minute rules changes as in allowing ballots to keep coming in past the deadline that a judge allowed, etc. What it will come down to is whether the Supreme Court wants to involved itself in something so politically charged. Some analysts think they won't.
republicans are pretending that arguments over the process of how election rules were changed in various states, somehow impacts the outcome. There are no allegations of voter fraud, no allegations that the will of the voters was altered. trump still got fewer votes. these cases would be of interest to lawyers and people who follow election law, but for the rest of us this doesn't change the outcome of the election. People voted legally, they voted based on the laws of their state. trump got fewer votes. No one is challenging the fact that trump got fewer votes in these states. One then can't come in after the fact and argue that the process by which voting laws were changed was illegal and therefore those voter's votes don't count somehow. Lol,
Also, if republicans were really bothered by these changes they could have brought these challenges before trump lost, before the election, last year even but they didn't because in some state's republican's approved of these changes and republicans didn't have a problem with those changes until trump lost. The gop is delusional, authoritarian, and anti-democratic
zzzzzzzzzyou see gop voters say lets verify the votes, lets have recounts, lets identify who voted etc, but of course they have been verifying the votes, recounting and already identified voters. That's what always happens in elections this one is no different. gop voters are delusional, authoritarian, and anti-democratic. their calls for "verifying" the votes is to give their anti-democratic desire the thin veneer of legality by just verifying that millions or hundreds of thousand of legal votes for Biden, are illegal. This is all happening out in the open. gop voters want to over turn an election in which trump got over 7 million fewer votes than Biden. they want to over turn an election in which 54% of voters didn't vote for trump to be president. gop voters don't see certain Americans as fully American and don't believe their votes should count. This belief is ugly but it is right there for all to see in their actions.
Not true. Anyone could drop them off at all in person voting sitesIf you get it your way what's to prevent other states from suing Texas on the basis of the same complaint? After all Republicans in Texas saw to it that voters in one of it's largest and most heavy populated counties were given only one mail in ballot drop off box in that entire county.
Nope, people who didn't have a constitutional right to make changes in the process did so at the last minute or during the counting process. Per the Constitution only the state legislature of that state can do so. That's what's being challenged.republicans are pretending that arguments over the process of how election rules were changed in various states, somehow impacts the outcome. There are no allegations of voter fraud, no allegations that the will of the voters was altered. trump still got fewer votes. these cases would be of interest to lawyers and people who follow election law, but for the rest of us this doesn't change the outcome of the election. People voted legally, they voted based on the laws of their state. trump got fewer votes. No one is challenging the fact that trump got fewer votes in these states. One then can't come in after the fact and argue that the process by which voting laws were changed was illegal and therefore those voter's votes don't count somehow. Lol,
Also, if republicans were really bothered by these changes they could have brought these challenges before trump lost, before the election, last year even but they didn't because in some state's republican's approved of these changes and republicans didn't have a problem with those changes until trump lost. The gop is delusional, authoritarian, and anti-democratic
How is what you posted in disagreement with what I posted?Nope, people who didn't have a constitutional right to make changes in the process did so at the last minute or during the counting process. Per the Constitution only the state legislature of that state can do so. That's what's being challenged.
That's right but ballots that weren't postmarked by election day and arriving late were still being counted. Alito required all ballots arriving under such circumstances had to be segregated from the rest. PA lawyers assured him that they would be so he allowed them to be counted. Then they mixed them in with the rest anyways, not segregating them. That was one of many irregularities that local officials pulled off in those four states and under election rules judges and election officials don't have that right. That's what's being challenged.If you had been paying attention to the matter you would know that from Pa's standpoint the matter is already been settled. Ballots postmarked by election day could arrive up to 3 days later and still be counted which amounted to only a few hundred ballots well short of what was needed to change the outcome.
You're claiming all these rules were put in place before the election, even more than a year ago. Nope, last minute changes were made by those who didn't have the right to make those changes. Only the state legislature could and they didn't.How is what you posted in disagreement with what I posted?
I can't speak for other states but when it comes to The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania where relatives of mine still live IT IS FINISHED LAW. Any ballot postmarked on or before election day could arrive up to 3 days after the the election would still count. And there was only a few hundred of those ballots . IT'S OVER! PENNSYLVANIA IS A DONE DEAL TEX.... YOUR EMPORER GOD LOST! ..MOVE ON !.That's right but ballots that weren't postmarked by election day and arriving late were still being counted. Alito required all ballots arriving under such circumstances had to be segregated from the rest. PA lawyers assured him that they would be so he allowed them to be counted. Then they mixed them in with the rest anyways, not segregating them. That was one of many irregularities that local officials pulled off in those four states and under election rules judges and election officials don't have that right. That's what's being challenged.
Antifa Leader Warns Trump: 'We're Armed - Concede By Sunday or We Retaliate'
Adam Rahuba, who claims to lead a violent mob of Antifa leftists in Pittsburgh, PA, warned President Trump and his supporters that armed thugs will target "conservative areas" if their demands are not met.
"If you do not concede by Sunday at noon, we will begin to block roads in conservative areas.
"Your supporters will not be able to go to work or go to the grocery store to feed their families.
"We are armed and will retaliate to attempts of vehicular homicide."
Rahuba’s Twitter account is littered with threats of violence and targeted hatred, yet he was allowed to continue to tweet.
It does not matter.![]()
Fake flag burning at Gettysburg was only the latest hoax by a Pennsylvania man
A Washington Post examination of Adam Rahuba's activities provides a rare inside look at the work of a homegrown troll who uses social media to stoke partisan division.www.stripes.com
You’ve been had
Well, there is your excuse to head to the streets and start killing 'others'.It does not matter.
Everyone has been waiting for a fall guy to start the shooting war and he is a prime example.
Antifa Leader Warns Trump: 'We're Armed - Concede By Sunday or We Retaliate'
Adam Rahuba, who claims to lead a violent mob of Antifa leftists in Pittsburgh, PA, warned President Trump and his supporters that armed thugs will target "conservative areas" if their demands are not met.
"If you do not concede by Sunday at noon, we will begin to block roads in conservative areas.
"Your supporters will not be able to go to work or go to the grocery store to feed their families.
"We are armed and will retaliate to attempts of vehicular homicide."
Rahuba’s Twitter account is littered with threats of violence and targeted hatred, yet he was allowed to continue to tweet.