Just like 97' all over again!

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
You can continue to think it's strong individualism all you want but it really cowardice

Weak people have no backbone and sell out their fellow workers for a attaboy. It takes balls to stand up to management. The strongest among us stand up for our coworkers even when it does not benefit him directly.
Collective Bargaining by its nature is for the weak to be on the same level as the strong and powerful.
I am all for Collective Bargaining because I understand its nature and don't have to get all emotional about it like you do.
Is is very important for the weak to stand united against the strong.
Deal with with your weakness on an intellectual level ... if you can.

I stand by my original post.
Strong people don't need Collective Bargaining and bristle at the moronic stands against individuals.
Not saying they are right or wrong.

What's your IQ Buddy?
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
you call it strong individualism I call it tounge :censored2:ing the boss mans ass.
Regardless of your spelling ability, this post is moronic and childish and speaks of little ability to organize and rationally discuss/debate a subject.

"tounge :censored2:ing the boss mans ass."
I'd expect better from a high schooler.
 

1989

Well-Known Member
You can continue to think it's strong individualism all you want but it really cowardice

Weak people have no backbone and sell out their fellow workers for a attaboy. It takes balls to stand up to management. The strongest among us stand up for our coworkers even when it does not benefit him directly.


I am not even a teamster and I will be on strike with them if it happens.





OMFG I made a typo! I am so glad you found it! did that give you a little scabby hardon?

lol I don't need collective bargaining to earn what I earn at UPS and I certainly don't need the union to defend me. I can get a job making what I do now at a private shop or a dealer around here. I am here for the benefits and hopefully a pension if it does not go belly up.
CHILL DUDE
 

brownalltheway

Well-Known Member
If you go like you did in ‘97, the volume will go elsewhere and then hopefully you can collect your 50 dollars from the union and be out of a job. Think twice unless your a liberal who likes to live on government assistance
 

rod

Retired 22 years
Sounds like a strike is the only thing that can get the companies attention that they need to make some adjustments to their work load problems. JMO
 

olroadbeech

Happy Verified UPSer
If you go like you did in ‘97, the volume will go elsewhere and then hopefully you can collect your 50 dollars from the union and be out of a job. Think twice unless your a liberal who likes to live on government assistance
sounds like you have been brainwashed.

if negotiations break down then a walkout will get their attention. the only thing that works in almost all cases is to hit them in the wallet.

now is the time to talk strike and mean it. no bluffing.
 

eats packages

Deranged lunatic
Collective Bargaining by its nature is for the weak to be on the same level as the strong and powerful.
I am all for Collective Bargaining because I understand its nature and don't have to get all emotional about it like you do.
Is is very important for the weak to stand united against the strong.
Deal with with your weakness on an intellectual level ... if you can.

I stand by my original post.
Strong people don't need Collective Bargaining and bristle at the moronic stands against individuals.
Not saying they are right or wrong.

What's your IQ Buddy?
this is an awful choice of nouns and adjectives to be using... unless you actually believe what you just typed out hahahaha.
 
F

Frankie's Friend

Guest
If you go like you did in ‘97, the volume will go elsewhere and then hopefully you can collect your 50 dollars from the union and be out of a job. Think twice unless your a liberal who likes to live on government assistance
20180415_155943.jpg

20180411_235150.jpg
 

El Correcto

god is dead
Collective Bargaining by its nature is for the weak to be on the same level as the strong and powerful.
I am all for Collective Bargaining because I understand its nature and don't have to get all emotional about it like you do.
Is is very important for the weak to stand united against the strong.
Deal with with your weakness on an intellectual level ... if you can.

I stand by my original post.
Strong people don't need Collective Bargaining and bristle at the moronic stands against individuals.
Not saying they are right or wrong.

What's your IQ Buddy?
Calm down Ann Rand
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
He died July 7th, 1983. I had to Google that. I couldn't even remember if he was around when I worked. Yes he was-for 12 years.
I remember we had a moment of silence for him on that day in the PCM. First time I heard his name. The only 30 seconds of overtime where I did nothing in my 30 years.
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
I can already tell which drivers would cross at my center if we did strike. If they did cross they wouldn't have tires to drive to work the next day.

I couldn't imagine being a scab after the strike. I would guess none of them would last very long when it's all said and done.
My same thoughts in '97.
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
More likely, in the South, people of conscience and strong individualist.
And they pack too.

Keep your Socialism up North where it belongs.
Careful with the broad brush you use.
The South is finally waking up to the stupidity of scab labor and wages.
I pack and have a conscience.
Being in organized labor has no effect on my individualism.
Organized labor and Socialism are not the same despite fake news best efforts.
 

rod

Retired 22 years
Strong people don't need Collective Bargaining

I disagree. I will agree though that a Union is not needed if a company treats its employees like human beings and provides a decent wage and benefit package--if they are a profitable company. There are many great companies in the US that pay decent, have a decent health plan and offer profit sharing. I read about them all the time when they pay their employees profit sharing bonuses and the end of their fiscal year. These companies very seldom have labor problems.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Catatonic

Nine Lives
I disagree. I will agree though that a Union is not needed if a company treats its employees like human beings and provides a decent wage and benefit package--if they are a profitable company. There are many great companies in the US that pay decent, have a decent health plan and offer profit sharing. I read about them all the time when they pay their employees profit sharing bonuses and the end of their fiscal year. These companies very seldom have labor problems.
fixed it for you

Damn!
Seems like you would know how to edit a quote by now! :wince:
 
Top