trickpony1
Well-Known Member
For those who care, there is an update on one of the Leavenworth Ten, 1LT Michael Behenna, at:
www.DefendMichael.com
www.DefendMichael.com
Warner struck a plea bargain with the prosecution where he agreed to plead guilty to assault, maltreatment of a subordinate and making a false statement in exchange for not being charged with premeditated murder and for his future testimony against Lt Behenna.
After less than three and a half hours of deliberation the jury came back finding Behenna not guilty of making a false declaration and premeditated murder but guilty of UCMJ Article 118, unpremeditated murder and sentenced to 25 years confinement.[SUP][2][/SUP]
Warner struck a plea bargain with the prosecution where he agreed to plead guilty to assault, maltreatment of a subordinate and making a false statement in exchange for not being charged with premeditated murder and for his future testimony against Lt Behenna.
After less than three and a half hours of deliberation the jury came back finding Behenna not guilty of making a false declaration and premeditated murder but guilty of UCMJ Article 118, unpremeditated murder and sentenced to 25 years confinement.[SUP][2][/SUP]
Texan-
Read these two statements from TOS and then draw your own conclusions. It seems TOS just likes to argue.
Its important to note, that this soldier WAS NOT responsible for interrogating prisoners or subjects as that was NOT his DUTY.
What are you basing this statement on? Can you post your copy of this units SOP so we can see for ourselves that a platoon leader had no responsibility here?
Im not doing your research, do it yourself. Look for excuses all you want.
.
Nope. You made the statement. Show the unit SOP to back up your statement. Given your track record of posting outright lies on here it is a fair request that you should back up your wild claims. I know your statement was wrong and just a guess, or a lie, and I think you know it as well.
As a matter of fact I think the opposite of what you said is actually true and a platoon leader is responsible for gathering intelligence and questioning suspects in his area of operations.
Say what you want, accuse me of whatever you want, the matter is over and done with, CONVICTION.
.
No, you made the baseless claim that you cannot back up. I didn't say anything. I only requested you offer some type of proof to back up your wild, baseless, inaccurate claim. Most would call your inaccurate, false claim a lie. I didn't. If you only knew how stupid your statement was that a platoon leader does not have the authority to gather and act on intelligence in a combat environment you would be laughing at yourself also. I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and just asked for some type of proof. It's amazing how often you are wrong. I would think that even if you just flipped a coin you would get one of these things correct eventually but to actually guess and be wrong as often as you are has to be some type of record.
I need to prove nothing. The miltary court martial already has. This LT isnt being tried by YOU and ME. His case is over. He is convicted and sentenced.
The record speaks for itself. If he was innocent, why did his own men testify against him?
Peace.
Unless you can come up with something to support your false claim that a platoon leader cannot gather intelligence or question suspected terrorists in his area of operations I am going with you just got caught in another fib.
The military has done all the proving necessary.
Peace.
because that is what tos is best at.
I'm thinking "the other side" means false.