Understandable, I was just writing what I've experienced with our equipment, I do agree that there is not that much wear on the clutch when actually double shifting, but there is evidence that not using the clutch to shift will get you more miles out of it. And again only if you can shift extremly well without double clutching.
Good for you to at least take them out. Way to get the membership out to vote.
It is a law, "Contract Law". You think you are above your own rules and your own contract law. You want respect but you are not man enough to admit that if a manager has a roll away he should be fired just like any of us. So if he comes to work drunk, high on dope, touches a female customer on her breast, steals time or packages, punches anyone on company property then the manager still does not get fired. Why, because he wears a tie?! All men are created equal ring a bell? That means all men should be held equally accountable too.I want you to say that to GOD when he asks you if you think you are above his law smarty pants.
I guess when someone gets frustrated because they don't understand what someone is saying and they can't formulate a rational response, they then post some childish gibberish like this. It's been almost 20 years since I had a teenager in the house but let me try this again.(PS: This is the Tit for Tat part of my reply).
I never question anything God tells me to do nor do I think my self above the laws of my country in any way.
My point is that a rule or guideline stipulated in the contract between UPS and the Union is not a Law.
Sorry, I thought that was obvious but for you, I'll draw you a picture and send it to you via PM. I don't think anyone else on the site needs it, so no reason to post it.
Bring a parachute dude so you can at least enjoy the view on the way down.
Your post was childish so here is is my childish, moronic reply. "I'll try not to hit you on your head when I land."
Which brings me to one of my favorite retorts, "Better to be a smartass than a."
It is a law, "Contract Law".
No it's not, it is a TERM within the contract ... not a law.
A contract is defined by terms and conditions, not laws.
You think you are above your own rules and your own contract law.
Contract is for Union employees not non-union employees.
That means all men should be held equally accountable too.
I agree ... however, it's not determined for a non-union employee by the contract with Teamster union.
Who is the child? You call me names many times big guy I just tried to get you to see the path that lies before you with your pompous actions.
Funny I think ... Huh?
You must obide by your own rules, laws, and guidelines or you are a liar. If one can not be held accountable to his own rules then he has no integrity. You wonder why workers fail to give respect to people like you it is because of your holier than thou attitude.
I try to abide by the rules and guidelines UPS has communicated to me. UPS has no laws.
Webster's Dictionary, HOAX= a trick or fraud, To deceive with a hoax. You are a fraud. To deceive is to lie. You are a liar then too huh. It is your name so at least you are be honest about being a liar. So thanks for that.
Thanks for recognizing my honesty.
A true leader would have said yes he too should have been fired as we managers are to be held equally accountable for our actions just as we would hold accountable our employees for the same actions.
A true leader thinks about the situation and realizes that s/he should not treat every occurrence exactly the same ... unless they are forced to by the union contract.
I guess you disagree with 705red that UPS should have treated the 5 year person with cancer differently from a healthy new hire?
But no not Hoax. Did not the devil trick by deceit or hoax? Just a thought.
Funny I think ... Huh?
lmao; there where ten pages on this! the issue is the mgmt is claiming b/c of their super-training they are better drivers! gawd
