Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Man this will destroy their peak plan if the IBT doesn’t fold.
No more PVDs?
- Thread starter Brownslave688
- Start date
Netsua 3:16
AND THAT’S THE BOTTOM LINE
Nice post brotha
just forwarded
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Going to be very interesting to watch this play out.Nice post brotha
How the new President candidates respond to this could be very important
Last edited:
Wilson1397
Half the lies they tell about me aren't true!!
you’re assuming they have a plan, but I agree this will throw a wrench in the system.
542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
@BigUnionGuy or @Bubblehead
I was always under the impression that Seattle had the PVD grievance that was going to Nationals.
Was this LU804 PVD grievance heard at Nationals? I would assume it would have to have been if it went to arbitration. Unless I'm missing something. Any insight?
I was always under the impression that Seattle had the PVD grievance that was going to Nationals.
Was this LU804 PVD grievance heard at Nationals? I would assume it would have to have been if it went to arbitration. Unless I'm missing something. Any insight?
BrownSnowFlake
Well-Known Member
If they were Package Car Drivers their job title would be Package Car Driver. Instead it's Personal Vehicle Driver. Because they drive their Personal Vehicle.
I don't love them any more than you do but this is very silly.
I don't love them any more than you do but this is very silly.
DELACROIX
In the Spirit of Honore' Daumier
They handle packages, they wear the uniform, they use a diad, they drive out of the same building, delivers to a consignee and gets paid by the same employer for the same services as a collective bargaining employee.
“If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a
...”
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
This is literally an arbitration ruling saying they were classified wrong.
BrownSnowFlake
Well-Known Member
They handle packages, they don't wear the uniform, they use a phone, they drive out of their residence...They handle packages, they wear the uniform, they use a diad, they drive out of the same building, delivers to a consignee and gets paid by the same employer for the same services as a collective bargaining employee.
“If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a
BrownSnowFlake
Well-Known Member
And yet the company used then just the same last peak.
The arbitrators could say the sky is green, doesn't mean anything.
Of course we live in a post-truth society so I'm not surprised at all.
542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
Wow... You need to learn to read. The decision was made yesterday not last year.
Actually it absolutely does mean something.
I'm not surprised you don't understand what you're talking about.
542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't be so sure about that on both points.
Rack em
Made the Podium
I very much mind them. If the company wants to hire seasonal workers to drive a brown truck, that's fine. But the whole pvd model should never have been allowed at ups!
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
An arbitrators ruling is final and binding.... on both parties.
PASinterference
Yes, I know I'm working late.
I'll bet it doesn't get settled until after this peak.
BigGuy2732
Well-Known Member
Can’t wait to work 14 hour days again.
