trplnkl
555
From the first post, it was MHO that this thread was about the double standard that is applied at UPS, not about who is the better driver, trainer, employee, bottle washer, Indian Chief or who has the widest ass.
If an hourly has a roll away that does, they are terminated. They may, through the grievance process get the job back without back and "time served" so to speak, maybe not. We've all seen or heard of it happening either way.
Now, on the other hand if it is a management person, this isn't even called an accident but an incident, no apparent punishment. If this isn't a double standard, it don't rain in southern California. As we learned in another thread on here, there seems to be a rule of thumb that management is above the law.
Sorry Hoax, I don't buy your theory of union vs. non-union to alibi the double standard. Allow me to explain.
I'm not sure this thread would have come to a pissing match if the focus had stayed on the double standard issue instead of who's Dad can beat up who's Dad.
I can tell you two facts, one is that I would not want to try driving feeders through a blowing snow storm or on icy roads or even a good night for that matter. Second fact, I am positive I could not do the trainers job, I have trouble memorizing the 5 seeing habits. I tip my hat to both groups.
If an hourly has a roll away that does, they are terminated. They may, through the grievance process get the job back without back and "time served" so to speak, maybe not. We've all seen or heard of it happening either way.
Now, on the other hand if it is a management person, this isn't even called an accident but an incident, no apparent punishment. If this isn't a double standard, it don't rain in southern California. As we learned in another thread on here, there seems to be a rule of thumb that management is above the law.
Sorry Hoax, I don't buy your theory of union vs. non-union to alibi the double standard. Allow me to explain.
Yes, this is in the contract, I suspect by the insistence of UPS, not the union. The company chooses which articles of the contract they want to pursue and which ones they want to ignore, just as some drivers do. If the goal was to merely punish a union employee with a suspension instead of a termination, that could be done on a case by case with suspension or termination as the case demands based on previous history. I would be willing to bet that any driver would readily accept a few days off without pay vs. having to fight to get their job back and call it a lesson well learned.Yes you would per the contract. UPS would have to do that or lose the ability to do so in the future.
Based on your previous history you would be brought back with suspension time off without pay.
At least that is the way it usually goes in Georgia. Can't speak for other Locals.
I'm not sure this thread would have come to a pissing match if the focus had stayed on the double standard issue instead of who's Dad can beat up who's Dad.
I can tell you two facts, one is that I would not want to try driving feeders through a blowing snow storm or on icy roads or even a good night for that matter. Second fact, I am positive I could not do the trainers job, I have trouble memorizing the 5 seeing habits. I tip my hat to both groups.