I thought all 22.3 jobs were full time positions?
It's like that here. Full-time Trumps part time.
Weren't 22.3 jobs created for more full time positions?
Correct. 22-3s are all full-time. I see nothing in the contract that states that as full-timer can bump a part-timer on the vacation list. I see plenty of language allowing full-timers to bump part-timers in the event of a layoff, but that's
Yes it's a full-time job
Is there some sort of seniority list for the 22.3 and part timers? Are they separate or all on the same list? Vacations are picked based off of some type of seniority list as far as I know.
I'll have to ask one of the 22.3 what list they pick from.
I brought it up with my BA, he said they've been doing it that way for years, since 22-3 came about. He kinda lost interest at that point, so I emailed the president of the Union. No answer back yet.
That is exactly how it comes up in the contract (55-3). And yet, apparently, they've been doing it that way for years.
Exactly. The contract backs this position up. I got bumped, and I'm pissed.
Contrary to what the contract allows, they,'ve been doing it for years. Or, so I've been told.
Let's say that were the case. I would still expect to use the seniority date. I would not simply have full-timers trump all part-timers strictly because of their part-time status. The contract does not allow it.
The issue here is that the contract does not allow for it, but it is happening nonetheless.
Our 22.3 guys have their own seniority list and they pick their own vacations. Part timers have their own as well as drivers and feeders we all pick our own vacations.
Well until someone grieves it there is no reason to change what they do right? Has it ever been grieved?
