And two tier has been here before, at least for PTers.
UPS has two priorities next contract.
1. Lower top rate for new hires (two tier)
2. Get out of the defined pension and into a matching 401.
Whether this will happen is up to us.
And now the starting wage for PT is less then the minimum wage in some states and cities or counties. Do you want to see the same thing happen to package car drivers?And two tier has been here before, at least for PTers.
UPS has two priorities next contract.
1. Lower top rate for new hires (two tier)
2. Get out of the defined pension and into a matching 401.
Whether this will happen is up to us.
So in talking with a pretty savvy, seemingly pretty smart center manager, told me he believes the main purpose of Orion is so that if the union decides to strike again, they'll have the software in place to just hire off the streets for half of what they pay us, and then tell the union to take a hike eventually.. o asked where he got that from, and he said the next contract top rate FT driver pay will more then likely be cut by $7-$8 an hour unless you're grandfathered in because ups has to make up their losses somewhere. Something about they hardly show profit on shipping now, and they've been buying up other companies just to stay afloat right now.. anyone have any insight on this,?
You took the words right out of my fingertips. PREACH!!!!I don't recall UPS having a losing quarter. If any of this back peddling happens its only because the troops aren't getting involved. You will have only yourselves to thank.
because ups has to make up their losses somewhere.
Safe driving awards.What "losses"?
I highly doubt it would happen but if they did negotiate a $7-$8 pay cut from top rate then I would lose faith in my union.
And now the starting wage for PT is less then the minimum wage in some states and cities or counties. Do you want to see the same thing happen to package car drivers?
Who says that's their top priority?
We keep talking about the upcoming 2-tier driver rates as if it is a done deal but really it's pure speculation, is it not? It seems like it was born hear on BC and repeated enough to make it fact. It's not like we have heard it directly from UPS or the union so why are we making this assumption? It's as if we as drivers are admitting we make "too much" based on market conditions and therefore up and coming drivers simply cannot make what we make.
Shouldn't even get to us. Ken H should say NOPE. next issueHeard directly from Ken H.
Whether we give it to them is up to us.
You mean like the current drivers threw the retirees under the bus?It will become a reality only if spineless, boot-lickers (take a peak in the mirror) ALLOW it!