You lost me when you said "Hillary, nor any other decent, moral person." Spin it any way you like, she and Bill came out of the White House "broke", her words, in 2001. Their foundation received hundreds of millions from not only corporations and wealthy individuals, but foreign governments who can't legally directly contribute to presidential campaigns. As Secretary of State more than half of meetings she took with private concerns were large donors to her foundation. Some of those gained significantly from her and Bill's interceding on their behalf. And they both were paid large sums to just give speeches. Bill's fee went up to $750k a speech after she became Secretary of State. Bernie Sanders pointed out her speaking to Wall Street and especially to Goldman Sachs, which she wouldn't allow the transcripts to be published. "Must've been a pretty good speech" said Sanders. And then it was discovered that she kept a private server that she conducted gov't business on. Supporters like to say so did other Secretaries of State. Nowhere close. And didn't share top secret info with others who didn't have clearance. People who've done a fraction of what she did have been jailed and ruined. And AFTER she was subpoenaed she had the server acid washed to eliminate any possibility of recovering 33,000 emails, emails she claimed were just about things like yoga and Chelsea's wedding. She had no right to "bleach bit" them, and the Obama administration covered for her. And she and Bill went from broke to well over $100,000,000 in net worth as it was assumed she was the next president and access was being bought.
You want to talk to us as if we're naive about what goes on, that the Democrats are the good guys, the Republicans are the evil ones. I'll put forth that there's a huge amount of money flowing through Washington, and who has access to it depends on how convincing they can be about how the other side is doing the voters wrong. But make no mistake, each side has it's constituencies that it relies heavily on. The Repubs are about creating an environment that greatly benefits business, and supports a set of social values that draws in a large voting block. The Dems are beholden to various constituencies whose social values are often at odds with both business and the social values Republicans represent. It's an even bigger block in total. There are those in gov't who are true believers in each group's core values, but by and large it's about all that money, all that power. As voters we have to decide which group is going to do the most for us. If we need jobs, if we can't stand the idea of abortion, if we love the military, etc we vote Republican. If we believe business is destroying the environment, if we think the religious right will restrict our rights, etc we vote Democrat. And over time these positions have become polarized with people on each side demonizing the other side. And we seem to be demanding politicians who are so one sided they're almost caricatures. JFK and Harry Truman weren't on the extreme left, they represented all Americans as president. Compare them with Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama. Compare Donald Trump with Ronald Reagan. It's a sad state of affairs, no pun intended. And yet after reading this there are those here who'll tell me I'm completely wrong, the Democrats are in the right, the Repubs are stupid, greedy, blah, blah, blah. We get the government we deserve.